ITF found in DOWN, UPGRADING
Activities and informations reported to the control room:
Cleaning of NI/WI towers and new baffle areas with nitrogen "top gun" and isopropyl alcohol (Menzione, Zaza)
ASC_DIFFp_T{X,Y} addition for RL control test (#69259 Masserot, Viret)
The ASC_Acl server configuration has been updated to transmit at 200Hz the ASC_DIFFp_T{X,Y} channels to the rtpc26 where some tests of the RL control are running:
operations peformed between 2026-06-19-12h19m22-UTC and 2026-06-19-12h57m46-UTC
We enter also in NI tower
Today we enter the WI tower to clean it with nitrogen top gun
We enter also in NI tower
*** Mechanical Transfer Function Measurement of the WI Instrumented Baffle ***
Today, mechanical transfer function measurements of the WI instrumented baffle were carried out following the same procedure adopted for the WI instrumented baffle. The measurement configurations are shown in Figure 1.
As in the NI measurement campaign, the triaxial accelerometer was mounted on the instrumented baffle through a custom adapter. The final orientation of the sensor exhibited a slight misalignment with respect to the nominal vertical and horizontal directions. The resulting sensor orientations for the WI measurements were:
Figure 2,3,4: measurement configurations with the accelerometer mounted in the upper position of the instrumented baffle and the reference accelerometer positions.
Figure 5,6,7: measurement configurations with the accelerometer mounted in the lower position of the instrumented baffle and the reference accelerometer positions.
The analysis of the acquired data will follow.
The list of the acquisitions, together with the corresponding file names, is attached.
ITF found in DOWN, UPGRADING
Activities and informations reported to the control room:
Mechanical Transfer Function Measurement of the WI Instrumented Baffle (IFAE group, Fiori, Spinicelli) with the assistance of Gargiulo, Gherardini and Menzione
Measurement of the EOM power losses (#69252 De Rossi, Gosselin, Lagabbe, Spinicelli)
North arm still closed to vehicles as opposed to what previously communicated
We put a beam dumper after the M8 mirror on EIB to prevent the laser from going to the towers.
We suspected that the 3rd EOM has some power losses. To see whether or not this EOM transmits the power correctly, the EOM was removed from EIB and its transmission was measured with a 1 W laser. The measured losses were about 1%, but the observed power oscillations are about 1% too, so it is not clear whether or not there are losses due to the EOM. It has also been found that the EOM scatters some light as seen in the photos.
To measure the losses of the EOMs, the laser power was measured before the EOMs, after the second EOM and after the third one. All power measurements were done with Ophir calorimeter with an average over 10 s. The beam is always align using the BPL. The photodiode PMC_TRA was monitored for reference.
We replaced the third EOM with the spare that was in optics lab.
The losses measured with the spare EOM were a bit lower than the old one, we don't know if this is because the cristal was a bit dusty, or if it is a alignment problem.
After doing the measurements, we realized that the spare EOM cage was not tighten correcly, so we tighten all screws, which may affect the alignment of the EOM and so its losses.
The 22.304 MHz signal that is sent to the third EOM was switched on again. The beam after the EOMs has to be realigned with the mode matching telescope.
As requested by the IFAE team, we entered the central building to turn off both slds in the WI tower.
The attached figure shows the sources' positions.
*** Mechanical Transfer Function Measurement of the NI Instrumented Baffle ***
Today, mechanical transfer function measurements of the NI instrumented baffle were performed. The instrumentation, data acquisition system and excitation setup are described in the previous logbook entry [elog 69222]. The instrumented baffle was excited using the (big) shaker installed on the tower base.
The single reference monoaxial accelerometer was sequentially moved among three different locations within the NI tower, shown in Figure 1 (first pdf file):
Figure 1 shows the three reference locations together with close-up views of the sensor installation.
The triaxial accelerometer was mounted directly on the instrumented baffle and moved between two different locations during the measurement campaign. The upper and lower accelerometer positions are shown in Figure 2 (second pdf file).
The sensor was attached using a custom adapter manufactured by the IFAE group. Due to the threaded mounting, the final orientation of the sensing axes was determined by the thread engagement and could not be precisely aligned with the nominal vertical-horizontal reference frame.
The resulting sensor orientations were:
Figure 3,4,5: Measurement configurations with the accelerometer mounted in the upper position of the instrumented baffle. The three figures show the corresponding locations of the reference accelerometer: R1,R2,R3, respectively.
Figure 6, 7, 8 : Measurement configurations with the accelerometer mounted in the lower position of the instrumented baffle. The three figures show the corresponding locations of the reference accelerometer: R1, R2, R3, respectively
The measurements were performed before the installation of the flange baffle, in order to access the instrumented baffle structure directly.
The analysis of the acquired data will follow.
R. Cavalieri, F. Nocera
while inspecting the NE Ring Heater Power Supply (entry 69238) we noticed that the PCal Laser Power Supply (?) unit (see picture) has an ominously noisy fan.
I would suggest to have it checked/swapped with a spare.
The calibration is done for the displacement at the stabilized point : the entrance of the EOM.
For the shift, the vertical one was quite clean and gave a calibration of -1900 (V/V)/m, which means 526 um/(V/V) (plot 1)
For the horizontal shift, it was not as clean as the vertical one (plot 2), we might need to redo it. For now we decided to use the same calibration than the vertical one since they are not supposed to be different.
Then we did the calibration of the tilt by using the PZT on EIB (plot 3 and 4)
We know that the PZT has a dynamic of 3.5 mrad for 140 V, we did a scan of 3 V and found extreme values of 0.39 V/V and -0.73 V/V on Vnorm
We found 3.5e-3/140 *3/(0.39+0.73) = 67 urad / (V/V)
Similarly we found 68 urad / (V/V) for the horizontal.
We added the calibrated channels to ACL.
The results with the loop closed is showed in plot 5 and are quite in agreement with what we were expecting : few nrad and few nm of residual noise.
We keep the loop closed to monitor is long term behavior
R. Cavalieri, F.Nocera
we went to the NE and inspected the Ring Heater Power Supply and its cabling.
There is nothing special to say: it is a commercial device with a regular, *non-locking* power input connector and it uses a commercial 3-wire AC power supply cord (CEE 7/7 Plug to IEC 60320 C13 Power Cord, if you are interested in this sort of details).
If left alone, it does its job nicely.
During the NCal activities yesterday, the NE RH was accidentally switched off (see Fig. 1).
Benoit reported the presence of a loose cable in the RH electronics chain. Therefore, today Flavio inspected the system to investigate the issue and verify the cable connections.
Following the inspection, the RH was switched back on at 14:23 UTC with the voltage set to 16.6 V.
R. Cavalieri, F.Nocera
we went to the NE and inspected the Ring Heater Power Supply and its cabling.
There is nothing special to say: it is a commercial device with a regular, *non-locking* power input connector and it uses a commercial 3-wire AC power supply cord (CEE 7/7 Plug to IEC 60320 C13 Power Cord, if you are interested in this sort of details).
If left alone, it does its job nicely.
Schedule: finalise installation of NEN and NWN, rearange all cablings
15 June 2026 : Start installation around 15:00 utc
| NEF lateral | NEF Vertical | NEM Axial | NEM Vertical | NEN Lateral | NEN Vertical | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old values | -7.661 | -7.03 | 7.435 | 8.225 | 7.954 | 7.306 |
| New values | -7.1195 | -6.7015 | 7.1135 | 6.607 | 6.651 | 7.06 |
| NWF lateral | NWF Vertical | NWM Axial | NWM Vertical | NWN Lateral | NWN Vertical | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old values | 7.05 | -7.12 | -7.753 | 6.7530 | -8.035 | 7.063 |
| New values | 6.777 | -6.9343 | -6.9823 | 6.7602 | -6.9060 | 6.7322 |
Means of sensors values below 1 micron now
Remove jigs and align setup to better than 0.05 mm (see NEB_WestSetupAlignment histogram)
| NSF Lateral | NSF Vertical | NSM Axial | NSM Vertical | NSN Lateral | NSN Vertical | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Old values | -7.444 | 7.619 | -7.361 | -7.691 | 7.004 | -7.764 |
| New values | -7.0234 | 7.2171 | -7.0236 | -7.3403 | 6.4019 | -7.3625 |
Mean sensor values below 3 micron now
At the end of the intervention we have :
Box 2021-08 (R4-32) on NSN with LED "away" from mirror
Box 2024-12 (R4-12) on NEN with LED "away" from mirror (and generating loop attached)
Box 2021-04 (R4-30) on NNN with LED "close" to mirror
Box 2024-10 (R4-10) on NWN with LED "away" fro mirror. It produces more accoustic noise than the others
The rotor cables for NWN have been installed
All rotors have been tested during few minutes at 50Hz.The difference in acoustic noise between the NNN and the others was less noticeable than at the nominal frequency.
All microphones gain have been set to 40dB (East and West setup were at 60dB. South was at 40 dB... We don't remember for North).
All temperature sensor gains have been adjusted to follow the new cabling on the DAQ boxes.
NB: During the NCal power supply reshuffling, we touched the ring heater power supply connector and the power supply switched off for a short time (on 15 June 15:30 UTC). Ring heater experts will come to check.
This afternoon we started to work on the calibration of the BPL.
We used a substrate in fused silica which thickness is 10 mm and placed it after EIB_M1c at around the same distance than the EOM entrance (the point to be stabilized). This corresponds to about 12.5 cm from PZT2.
Then we rotated it both around the X and Y axis in order to induced a known shift towards the QPD.
The plots are attached to this entry. We will analyze it in details tomorrow.
The calibration is done for the displacement at the stabilized point : the entrance of the EOM.
For the shift, the vertical one was quite clean and gave a calibration of -1900 (V/V)/m, which means 526 um/(V/V) (plot 1)
For the horizontal shift, it was not as clean as the vertical one (plot 2), we might need to redo it. For now we decided to use the same calibration than the vertical one since they are not supposed to be different.
Then we did the calibration of the tilt by using the PZT on EIB (plot 3 and 4)
We know that the PZT has a dynamic of 3.5 mrad for 140 V, we did a scan of 3 V and found extreme values of 0.39 V/V and -0.73 V/V on Vnorm
We found 3.5e-3/140 *3/(0.39+0.73) = 67 urad / (V/V)
Similarly we found 68 urad / (V/V) for the horizontal.
We added the calibrated channels to ACL.
The results with the loop closed is showed in plot 5 and are quite in agreement with what we were expecting : few nrad and few nm of residual noise.
We keep the loop closed to monitor is long term behavior
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
