After the completion of the SDB1 tower evacuation, the VAC team opened the BS-SR and DET cryotrap valves to send the NI single bounce beam towards SDB1. Meanwhile Paolo restored the reference position of the SDB1 bench in vacuum and closed the position loops. Henk-Jan restored the nominal height of SDB2 and could then close the position loops.
We adjust the SDB1 angular setpoints in order to center the beam on the B1p camera (Fig.1): This was achieved by setting TX = 70 and TY = 80 urad
Noticing that the TX correction is around -4V, we acted on the BENCH_TX motorized counter-weight with -16000 steps in order to reduce this correction around -0.4V. Adding this to the steps performed last week, the motorized counter-weight is now off-centered in TX by -50000 steps.
We adjust the OMC Peltier gain (from 20 to 50) in order to be able to control the OMC temperature in vacuum. OMC temperature stabilization loop closed at 13h46 utc.
We close B5 beam drift control at 13h50 utc. The position of the B5 and B1p beam on their cameras with the B5 drift control closed are shown on Fig.2 and Fig.3
Open OMC shutter at 13h56 utc. We check that in these conditions, the B1s beam is almost perfectly centered on the camera (Fig.4). The powers obtained on the photodiodes are shown in Fig.5. In particular we have 78 mW on B1p and 93 mW on B1s.
We start an OMC lock acquisition at 14h18 utc starting from 22.45 deg. We observe a mode of order 5. Therefore we stop the scan and adjust manually the OMC temperature to 22.54 deg. Start another scan for OMC lock acquisition at 14h23m50. The OMC is properly locked around 14h30 utc (Fig.6) with about 12.8 uW on B1_PD3.
We improved the alignment of the OMC in TX and achieve about 14.8 uW on B1_PD3 (Fig. 7).
Start OMC scan at 14h57 utc
Order 1: 1.1 uW > 7% of misalignment defect
Order 2: 0.2 uW > 1.4% of mode mismatch
We update the picomotors names as follows:
* Old "B5_M2_H" / "B5_M2_V" becomes now : "B5_M1_H" / "B5_M1_V"
* Old "B5_M1_H" / "B5_M1_V", becomes now: "B1s_M3_H" / "B1s_M3_V"
We then try to close the SDB2 galvo loops. All loops were closed at first attempt except the galvo of B5_QD2 (the new B1s QPD). In order to recenter the beam on the quadrant we acted on the mirror B1s_M3 with the following steps:
B1s_M3_H -1200 steps
B1s_M3_V +1200 steps
Then the B5_QD2 galvo loops was closed successfully.
We also acted on B1p_M1 and B1p_M2 to reduce a bit the vertical corrections (B1p M2 V +400, B1p_M1_V +300)
Fig. 8 shows all galvo loops closed with small level of corrections.
We open all galvo loops at 15h34 utc.
Scan SDB2 bench in TY (Fig.9): We can see that for the nominal setpoint of the bench TY = 880 urad the B1p photodiodes are well centered and during the scan the beam is always inside B1s. For B5, TY=880 corresponds to a maximum, but it is very close to the edge of the power plateau. This behaviour is probably due to the fact that the photodiode is seeing a second beam in addition to the main beam (as on B5 camera) when the main beam is close to being clipped. We decided to adjust the centering of the B5_PD2 photodiode (acting on B5_M3 and B5_M4 picomotors) in order to better center the main beam for TY=880 urad. While repeating the TY scan of the bench, we obtain Fig.10. We intentionally kept the B5p photodiodel on a maximum for TY=880, but it is not clear if that is the best tuning. We leave it as it is for now.
Fig.11 shows a small scan in TX which does not have any impact on the photodiodes power.
We conclude here the alignement checks.
Close OMC shutter at 16h55 utc.
At the end of the shift we restore the SDB1 floating setpoints. Then we open the B5 beam drift control and restore the B5 QD offsets used in dark fringe.