The beam parameters obtained from fitting the measured data can be seen in the attached Figure. It must be noted that the sagital and tangential data points have been fitted independently.
The beam parameters obtained from fitting the measured data can be seen in the attached Figure. It must be noted that the sagital and tangential data points have been fitted independently.
This morning we resumed our activities on the SDB2 bench. We reopen the OMC shutter at 07h34 utc. We checked that the bench position (blocked) and the beam position on the B1p, B1s and B5 cameras did not change during the night.
We install one iris on the B1s beam path next to the SDB2-EDB viewport and another iris in front of the OMC to have alignment references.
We start the process of displacing SDB2_B5_M1 to its new position: (x, y) = ( -0.225, -0.331) m (using the optocad reference frame).
We realigned the B1s beam on the first iris by acting on B1s_M2 picomotor:
- B1s_M2_V: 2700
- B1s_M2_H: 13000
We also realign the B1s beam on the iris placed in front of the external OMC by acting on the last folding mirror before the EDB telescope.
We acted on the picomotors of B5_M1 in order to center the beam on B5_QD1.
- B5_M1_H: -3800
- B5_M1_V: -6000
To characterize the beam after the lens, we use the Smartek camera, its sensor is placed at an initial position (z=0) which corresponds to the bench coordinate X=-450+22.5-12 = -439.5mm along the beam axis between the galvo and the quadrant.
We take data points at:
- z=0 at 14h37 utc (integration time is set to 8000 us)
- z=25 at 14h42 utc
- z=50 at 14h46 utc
- z=75 at 14h51 utc
- z=100 at 14h52 utc
- z=125 at 14h55 utc
##### Error in measurement: height of beam on the lens was mistakenly changed
- z=275 at 15h13 utc (we change the integration time to 16000 us)
- z=300 at 15h16 utc
- z=325 at 15h19 utc
- z=350 at 15h22 utc
- z=375 at 15h24 utc
- z=400 at 15h26 utc
##### New measurements with corrected height of beam on the lens
- z=275 at 15h37 utc (we change the integration time to 16000 us)
- z=300 at 15h43 utc
- z=325 at 15h46 utc
- z=350 at 15h49 utc
- z=375 at 15h52 utc
- z=400 at 15h55 utc
- z=425 at 15h58 utc
- z=450 at 16h01 utc
- z=475 at 16h05 utc
The analysis of these data points gives the following parameters for the B1s beam going towards the quadrant:
* Sagital beam : w0s = 322.3 +/-2.3 um, z0s = -116.8 +/-2.3 mm, zRs = 306.7 mm
* Tangential beam : w0t = 256.7 +/-1 um, z0t = -68.9 +/-1.3 mm, zRt = 194.6 mm
This gives the following coordinates for the Gouy phase at 45 deg:
* For the sagital axis (vertical), X = -439.5 + z0S +zRS = -249.6mm
* For the tangential axis (horizontal), X = -439.5 + z0t +zRt = - 313.8 mm
Therefore the QPD sensor should be placed around X = -281.7 mm. This means that the QPD oblong hole should be around X = -258.2. Since this position is too close from the galvo, we displaced the galvo by -75 mm in Y in order to shorten the optical path. And we finally placed the QPD sensor at X=-350-23.5 = -373.5 mm, and Y = 450 mm.
We then aligned the beam on the QPD by acting on the B5_M1 picomotors with -3800 steps in H and +2800 steps in V. We then were able to close the galvo loops as shown on Fig.1. We notice that the corrections in vertical have large fluctuations. This is probably due to the limited distance between the galvo and the quadrant (only ~123 mm).
We added a beam dump in reflection of the QPD.
During this process we had to remove and add some components, namely:
- Removed: Beam dump and screws weighing 169g.
- Added: clamp weighing 20g
- Added: 5 cable ties weighing 6.5g
- Added: cable extension weighing 42g
- Added: clamp and screws weighing 23g
- Added: new lens (f = 125 mm) mounted on column and clamp weighing 267g
- Removed: clamp plus screws weighing 15 g.
- Removed: beam dump in reflection of B5_M1 with clamp and screws weighing 169 g.
- Removed: clamp plus screws weighing 16 g.
- Added: Beam dump and screws weighing 170g (in reflection of the B5_QD1 quadrant).
We stop here for the day. Tomorrow morning we will rebalance the bench and check the alignment with the bench suspended in air.
The beam parameters obtained from fitting the measured data can be seen in the attached Figure. It must be noted that the sagital and tangential data points have been fitted independently.
ITF found in COMMISSIONING Mode and DOWN state, with MISALIGNED_ALL_BUT_NI state on ARMS_LOCK node (equal to SINGLE_BOUNCE_NI state from ITF_LOCK).
The activities of the shift were:
ITF left as it was found: COMMISSIONING Mode and DOWN state, with MISALIGNED_ALL_BUT_NI state on ARMS_LOCK node.
After restoring the Injection loops yesterday, we notice that the system was not completely stable. The issue was initially identified through an alarm on the RMS value of the BsX_TX signal (Fig. 1). Further investigation showed that the excess noise originates from the EIB bench actuators (Fig. 2). All actuators show increased noise starting from the EIB rebalancing performed yesterday morning. Around 17:30h LT, we went into the Laser Lab to do a visual inspection on the bench, but we coudn't identify anything suspect (nothing touching or blocking the bench somehow). We slightly tightened the screw on the plexiglass panel that had been opened to move some weights on the bench yesterday. This appeared to reduce the excess noise somewhat, but the noise is still present this morning (see FFT on Fig. 3 of the broadband noise before and after).
Investigations are ongoing.
Entry of August 17, 2026 remained in draft by mistake.
ITF found in TROUBLESHOOTING Mode and DOWN State.
All times are UTC.
07:20 - 08:14 INJ: EIB restore (Melo, Lagabbe, #69586, #69587).
08:06 - 08:56 VAC: Activity on minilinks near to BS tower (Macchia, Francescon).
08:38 ISC: Etalon loops turned off (operator).
11:35 DET: Start of SDB2 intervention preparation (see attached document):
13:10 VAC: NI/WI Large Valves closed (#69584).
13:35 DAQ: Virgo Process Monitoring update to version v10p4r2 (Pacaud, #69588).
14:46: Set MISALIGNED_ALL_BUT_NI state on ARMS_LOCK node.
14:28: Added -20 urad PR TY to avoid ghost beams.
14:54 DET: Offsets for SDB1_Quadrants removed (as done performing OMC Lock/Scan during periodic maintenance).
15:00 DET: Begin of SDB2 activity (Gouaty, Romero).
ITF left in COMMISSIONING Mode and DOWN state, with MISALIGNED_ALL_BUT_NI state on ARMS_LOCK node (equal to SINGLE_BOUNCE_NI state from ITF_LOCK).
The activity in DET LAB is still ongoing.
This afternoon, we entered the Detection Lab between 15h00 and 15h30 utc. We opened the door of SDB2 vacuum chamber.
Then we blocked the bench and adjusted the blocked position in order to have the bench as close as possible from its nominal setpoints.
Nominal setpoints are the following : TX = -280, TY = +880, TZ = +24, X = +10, Y = +500, Z = -190
The blocked position we achieved is the following (see Fig.1): TX = -239, TY = +819, TZ = +24, X = +82, Y = -152, Z = 154.
In these conditions, we can observe a beam on the B1p camera as shown on Fig.2 (the beam is miscentered by only +0.4 mm both in X and Y). The NI single bounce beam is set, with the SDB1 bench under B5 drift control (with B5 QPD offsets at 0).
We opened the OMC shutter and checked that the B1s beam is more or less centered on its camera (see Fig.3). The B5 beam is also visible on the camera (Fig.4).
After this check we closed the OMC shutter.
We then tested the camera that we intend to use tomorrow to characterize the beam properties on B1s. To this purpose we plugged the power cable of the camera on mezzanine camera of DAQ box 51 using the second slot (slot 1), that is normally used by B1t_Cam. We unplugged the ethernet cable (green) from B1t_Cam and plug it on our camera. We updated the serial number of SDB2_B1t_cam in process DET_Img_CEB. We also took this opportunity to correct the pixel size of the B1s camera (see entry https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=69551 ). Process stop and started at 18h22m29 utc.
We leave the ITF in NI single bounce for the night.
Xenhost160 has been replaced with another PowerEdge M640 as the broken one.
recovered.
After properly recovering EIB after the incident of Friday afternoon (#69582), we attempted to close the BPC loop, but the BsX_PZT_UH correction was too large and the loop was unable to close, as the control action was continuously driven away. We therefore discharged the DSP-card integrators and adjusted the BPC setpoints to keep the beam approximately aligned on the Mode Cleaner.
Since the resulting alignment was not optimal, the following actions were performed, with only the BPC loop closed:
TY setpoint was slightly adjusted to compensate for the changes introduced by the BPC loop, particularly on TY.X setpoint was kept at -100 µm, as setting it to 0 resulted in excessively large BPC UH corrections (approximately -6 V).MAR_TY bench setpoint was returned to its original value, as otherwise the BPC X and TY corrections were not properly centered.After these adjustments, all loops could be successfully closed at full bandwidth, including the RFC loop.
Some notes:
1. while steering the corrections of the BPL loop we noticed that changes we made on the TX and TY were making effect on X and Y because of a copy-paste error on the ACL code and we fixed it. Now all DoFs correspond to their respective corrections.
2. The BPL loop was closed after the BPC, this was probably the cause of the bad alignment we had on the BPC and probably the reason why it could not close on the nominal setpoint to begin with. Therefore, it should be the first loop to be closed (for future reference).
I have released a new version v10r4p2 of VirgoProcessMonitoring, that fixes some issues in the WEB interface for browsing configuration file history, and add some facilities for the defintion of the directories used for log files and application executables. All instances have been restarted to use this new version around 15:30 today.
This morning, staring from 7:30h UTC we continued the work on EIB. In order to close again the loop, we had to move around some weights on EIB, and touch a bit the water tubes and then the loop could close correctly. Fortunately no weights had to be added or removed.
At around 14:30 LT the EIB control actuator (ACT5) went out of range without any apparent reason. Attempts to open and close the EIB loops were unsuccessful.
I went to the LL and checked/rearranged the water tubes, which are a known weak point and a common cause of EIB going out of range. Although I was able to bring the TY closer to its nominal position, the loop still could not be closed.
I then contacted Henk Jan, and we remotely adjusted some microsprings to bring the EIB back towards its nominal position. This was not sufficient, however, as the microsprings were approaching their maximum dynamic range.
The current solution is therefore to adjust the weights on the bench to bring the EIB closer to its nominal position and allow the loops to be closed. However, this action is very time consuming and we decided to postpone it to Monday morning since the ITF is not needed during the weekend. Therefore, I left the system in safe mode: all the loops opened (BPC, AA, RFC), put the PMC in scan and blocked the beam on the output of Laser Bench.
This morning, staring from 7:30h UTC we continued the work on EIB. In order to close again the loop, we had to move around some weights on EIB, and touch a bit the water tubes and then the loop could close correctly. Fortunately no weights had to be added or removed.
ITF found in LOCKED_MICH_HF_DC in COMMISSIONING mode.
At 12:00 UTC we collected several crisis of ISYS. We were not able to close EIB loops. Melo in Laser Lab to check on it with Bulten from remote. After a deep investigation we decided to postpone the intervention on EIB for Monday morning.
ISYS left in safe conditions.
TROUBLESHOOTING mode set.
ITF found in COMMISSIONING Mode and LOCKED_ARMS_IR State.
All times are UTC.
07:55 - 08:35 INJ: Damper removal to allow refence beam reaching phase cameras (Melo, Tacca, #69570).
08:54 - 09:55 ISC: B4/B1p PC realignment, works on EPRB (Tacca, Guo, Bothra).
10:05 - 10:39 INJ: PC pickoff alignment (Melo, #69572).
12:09 - 13:10 ISC: Installation of PC enclosured on EPRB (Tacca, Guo, Bothra).
13:44 - 14:53 DET: Checks in DET Lab (Tacca, Guo, Bothra).
The work during the shift was the Check of Phase Camera alignment carried out by Bothra, Guo, Melo, and Tacca (see #69578).
ITF left in COMMISSIONING Mode and LOCKED_MICH_HF_DC State.
We checked the alignment of both B4 and B1p phase cameras profiting of the interferometer locked with MICH at half fringe.
Work for B4 phase camera:
Work for B1p phase camera:
Figure 4 shows the beams acquired by the phase cameras after the intervention: B4 is not perfectly centered, we will optimize its alignment once all the alignment loops are engaged in CARM NULL; B1p is showing fringes, we checkd the path of the beam on the bench and we realized that the fringes are coming from the ITF, probably due to some clipping on the suspended benches not perfectly aligned at this stages.
Next steps:
Some issues occured last week in the RDS stream on the archive_50Hz directory : as consequence the rds Frame File list was built with some frame files not correctly handle by the Fd library .
To avoid this kind of issue, the Fm package has been upgraded in the v5r00 release
After some tests, this release has been put in operation on the VirgoOnline Fm servers :
Since the power on the phase camera was very low, M. Tacca asked me to align the reference beam. So, I went to the LL and with the two mirrors in front of the phase camera pick-off in fiber I tried to align the beam around 12.30h LT. For the alignment, I took as reference the channel EPRB_B4_PC_CAR_PWR and the corresponding camera image. The alignment is not easily done since the mirrors are difficult to reach by hand, but some improvement could be done as shown in the attached image.
The following report has been submitted to the On-call interface.
On-call events -> Air Conditioning
Title: Chiamata per bassa pressione circuito aria TERMINALE NORD
Author(s): Pezzimenti
| Called at: 04:00, 08-08-2026, by: Alarm or monitoring system |
| Remote intervention: Started: ; Ended: |
| On-site intervention: Started: 07:30, 08-08-2026; Ended: 08:20, 08-08-2026 |
| Status: Resolved |
| Operator when issue resolved: None |
Details:
Ho ricevuto intorno alle ore 4:00 circa di sabato 8 agosto un messaggio sul telefono del reperibile, per un allarme di bassa pressione nell'edificio tecnico del Terminale Nord. Chiamando Andreazzoli Sergio (persona di riferimento in quel periodo), Ha ritenuto necessario fare un controllo il giorno seguente di buon ora, in quanto la linea comunque era supportata dall'altro compressore, ed i valori sulla linea finale di pressione erano nella norma. Arrivato sul sito, trovo il selettore rotativo MANUALE su "0" quindi SPENTO. Ho ripristinato il selettore ruotandolo su "1" quindi "ACCESO", ed il compressore è ripartito senza che effettuassi nessun'altra operazione. Ho atteso che anche quella linea tornasse nei valori di pressione stabiliti, confrontandomi sempre telefonicamente con Andreazzoli. Per sicurezza ho fatto anche un controllo al Terminale Ovest, ma non ho trovato nessuna anomalia.
* Note that any files attached to this report are available in the On-call interface.
The following report has been submitted to the On-call interface.
On-call events -> Air Conditioning
Title: Chiamata per bassa pressione circuito aria TERMINALE NORD
Author(s): Pezzimenti Francesco
| Called at: 04:00, 08-08-2026, by: Alarm or monitoring system |
| Remote intervention: Started: ; Ended: |
| On-site intervention: Started: 07:30, 08-08-2026; Ended: 08:20, 08-08-2026 |
| Status: Resolved |
| Operator when issue resolved: None |
Details:
Ho ricevuto intorno alle ore 4:00 circa di venerdi 7 agosto un messaggio sul telefono del reperibile, per un allarme di bassa pressione nell'edificio tecnico del Terminale Nord. Chiamando Andreazzoli Sergio (persona di riferimento in quel periodo), Ha ritenuto necessario fare un controllo il giorno seguente di buon ora, in quanto la linea comunque era supportata dall'altro compressore, ed i valori sulla linea finale di pressione erano nella norma. Arrivato sul sito, trovo il selettore rotativo MANUALE su "0" quindi SPENTO. Ho ripristinato il selettore ruotandolo su "1" quindi "ACCESO", ed il compressore è ripartito senza che effettuassi nessun'altra operazione. Ho atteso che anche quella linea tornasse nei valori di pressione stabiliti, confrontandomi sempre telefonicamente con Andreazzoli. Per sicurezza ho fatto anche un controllo al Terminale Ovest, ma non ho trovato nessuna anomalia.
* Note that any files attached to this report are available in the On-call interface.
The following report has been submitted to the On-call interface.
On-call events -> Air Conditioning
Title: Chiamata per bassa pressione circuito aria TERMINALE NORD
Author(s): Pezzimenti Francesco
| Called at: 04:00, 08-08-2026, by: Alarm or monitoring system |
| Remote intervention: Started: ; Ended: |
| On-site intervention: Started: 07:30, 08-08-2026; Ended: 08:20, 08-08-2026 |
| Status: Resolved |
| Operator when issue resolved: None |
Details:
Ho ricevuto intorno alle ore 4:00 circa di venerdi 7 agosto un messaggio sul telefono del reperibile, per un allarme di bassa pressione nell'edificio tecnico del Terminale Nord. Chiamando Andreazzoli Sergio (persona di riferimento in quel periodo), Ha ritenuto necessario fare un controllo il giorno seguente di buon ora, in quanto la linea comunque era supportata dall'altro compressore, ed i valori sulla linea finale di pressione erano nella norma. Arrivato sul sito, trovo il selettore rotativo MANUALE su "0" quindi SPENTO. Ho ripristinato il selettore ruotandolo su "1" quindi "ACCESO", ed il compressore è ripartito senza che effettuassi nessun'altra operazione. Ho atteso che anche quella linea tornasse nei valori di pressione stabiliti, confrontandomi sempre telefonicamente con Andreazzoli. Per sicurezza ho fatto anche un controllo al Terminale Ovest, ma non ho trovato nessuna anomalia.
* Note that any files attached to this report are available in the On-call interface.
Today, around 10.30h LT we removed the beam dump after the amplifier on the laser bench to allow the work on the phase cameras.
Since the power on the phase camera was very low, M. Tacca asked me to align the reference beam. So, I went to the LL and with the two mirrors in front of the phase camera pick-off in fiber I tried to align the beam around 12.30h LT. For the alignment, I took as reference the channel EPRB_B4_PC_CAR_PWR and the corresponding camera image. The alignment is not easily done since the mirrors are difficult to reach by hand, but some improvement could be done as shown in the attached image.
We (Matteo, Yuefan, and Yashwant) will enter in CEB to work on the phase cameras and confirm that there is no laser hazard to enter the building.
While we were retuning some step of the lock acquisition, the handoff of DARM to the IR was constantly failing due to an oscillation around ~70 Hz. We realized that this could be due to the missing structure at 68-72 Hz (fig.1), that we compensated in the DARM/CARM control filter while on the beating. Maybe its absence during the handoff was causing some stability issue.
We modified the controller in order to remove the resonant gain. After such modification, we succesfully performed a smooth transition to B1p 56MHz error signal.
We sligthly adjusted the beating control filter in order to recover the bandwidth and stability margins of yesterday, in order to cope with the 68-72 Hz structure, which was eating a lot of phase reducing the available margins. After the modification we recovered the situation of yesterday (performance wise). In fig.2 the comparison of CARM and DARM signal and correction spectra of yesterday (blue) and today (red) while locked on the beating.
We still don't know what is the structure of fig.1, but we know that we need that
:)
The goal of this commissioning task was to get the right configuration - arms resonant on IR beam with MICH in half fringe (HF), to get the PC reference images. This state, LOCKED_MICH_HF_DC, has been automated in the virgo system (virgoDev - Automation - userapps). It derives from the arms locked on IR (metatron state 40). Once this is achieved, the only d.o.f. to be controlled is the MICH. The LOCKED_MICH_HF_DC which is the desired state and its locking processes lives in the DRMI_LOCK.py and initialization of the locking process (gains, filter, weights, etc.) lives in DRMI_LOCK.ini.
To control the MICH d.o.f. we need the right error signal which can be used to lock when in the optimal configuration (half-fringe). The error signal used for MICH is the combination of the signals acquired at B4 and B1p. These signals are given by:
which are in a.u. and something we don't care about. Since we know the min and max of these signals we can try to optimize the error signal for our configuration using dedicated weights. The error signal for the MICH d.o.f. is given by the combination of the afforementioned signals:
LSC_B1p_SUM_NORM = SDB2_B1p_DC/(SDB2_B1p_DC + w*(SPRB_B4_DC))
where w is the weight for the B4 DC signal. This error signal should range between 0-1 which triggers the lock on the MICH d.o.f. when it is in the desired range. Figure below (pc_calib3) shows the error signal channels and the signals which it is derived from. To get the perfct half-fringe this should be 0.5 (given it ranges between 0-1). In the current algorithm, the locking of the d.o.f. is triggered when the error signal ranges from 0.4-0.6 (range). Once the error signals were defined and the process automated, we were able to achieve a relatively stable lock for the configuration. One of these locked state of this configuration along with the MICH trigger and MICH correction is shown in figure below (mich_hf_lock4). The trigger being 1 means the target d.o.f. is locked. Also in the plot we can see the correction signals, of the MICH d.o.f. which acts on the BS. We use the BS to control this dof. The range of the correction is +/-10 V. As we can see that there is a lot of correction that is being applied to keep the dof locked. The error signal also fluctuates a lot between 0.45-0.55 which means we cannot narrow down our range of the error signal as it will loose lock once the threshold is crossed. Apart from these signals also plotted are the B7 and B8 DC signals representing the power transmitted through the arm cavities. The SPRB B4 and SDB2 B1p PDs are the powers (a.u.) measured in bright and dark port of the interferometer. The lock acquisition of the MICH dof shows a ramp (figure: mich_hf_lockstep3) which is not clearly understood why. The trigger should work as relay switch (0 or 1).
In the next days we will also elaborate on the reults from noise injection on MICH control loop used in this configuration.