These results are so far qualitevely similar to the point absorbers measurements done at LMA VIR-0406A-26.
For WI the LMA measurements had shown one strong point absorber close to the center (-10mm, +24mm) with an expected absorbtion of 7-8mW for 100kW of power in the arms. It was point 5012 of the input mirror scan.
Analyzing the HWS image from yesterday with the same type of code as the LMA measurements I find that to make a comparable effect to what is on the HWS image, an absorption of 11mW is needed. The power in the arms is currentlny around 80kW, so scaling it to 100kW it correspond to an absorption of 14mW, almost double what was expected.
Figure 1 shows the HWS image after 10 wavefronts, roughly 5 minutes.
Figure 2 shows the model of the HWS image after 5 minutes for one point absorber and uniform absorption of 20mW.
Figure 3 shows the difference between the HWS image and the model
Figure 4 and 5 shows vertical and horizontal cuts through the HWS image and the model
/users/mwas/TCS/HWS_image_convolution/image_convolution_WI_IM01_transient.m
For NI several point absorbers with lower absorption are expected from the LMA measurement. Which qualitely is what is seen on the NI thermal camera image, where the points look much less bright than on the WI thermal camera image. A HWS image of NI would be needed to confirm that indeed the NI point absorbers have a lower absorption than the WI point.