This morning we went to EER to investigate the extra noise on the EIB LVDT. The idea was to check the 10 kHz generator used for the modulation/demodulation.
However, when arriving, we noticed that the noise had actually been lower since the 26th of August (Figure 1).
On that day, the chiller of the Neovan electronics, situated right next to the rack of the EIB electronics, stopped working at 14:00 UTC. We went to EER starting from 14:15, but the noise was reduced at 14:40...
Given these new elements, we suspected that some of the cables of the EIB electronics could be loose and sensitive to being touched.
We checked them, and some of them were indeed quite loose. Touching them was introducing glitches in the control loop. We tightened them. It still seems quite sensitive.
Anyway, the noise seems to be similar to the level it was before the 14th of August (Figure 2: blue now, purple 14/08 before the noise appeared, red 17/08 with the extra noise, green on 27/08). It is worth noting that the horizontal LVDT now seems to be higher. It is not easy to draw clear conclusions since these signals also depend on the seismic activity. Also, the noise reduction seen in the RMS on the 26th is not so clear in the FFT.
We will keep monitoring the situation and will speak with Henk Jan about whether or not we should undo the changes he made to the control filters on the 21st of August.
All these tests were done with the injection down and the flip mirror at the output of the PMC flipped up.
When relocking the injection with the same BPC corrections, the beam appeared to be quite far away from the IMC cavity, particularly horizontally.
We suspected that the EIB position was different from the morning. This seems to be confirmed by the fact that the BPL corrections have changed, the beam seen by IBJM is in a different position and the corrections of the EIB actuators are different. This is the case even though the only EIB position that changed was the Tx position of the EIB, which was 1 µrad away from this morning (Figure 3).
We are quite surprised by this. It might be evidence that something is wrong with the position read by the LVDT (?).