The aim of this shift, and the subsequent ones, is to perform the fine alignment of the WI PAM and characterize it using HWS-INJ.
Last Friday, I noticed that both TCS_PAM_WI_PowerSupply and TCS_PAM_WI_pico processes were grey in the VPM. I attempted to restart them, but without success. I then asked Giulio to check the devices, and he confirmed that neither the pico driver (picocltcs2) nor the power supply (rstcs3) was responding to ping requests.
This morning, Giulio restarted the WI pico driver and pico server, restoring communication with the devices (see 69946).
After lunch, we went to the TCS room to restart the WI PAM power supply process.
Since the WI mirror will be repeatedly heated during the PAM tests, the etalon control loop was switched off at 12:34 UTC by Madda and Francesco.
For the HWS-INJ measurement, I retrieved the positions of the optical components along the beam path used during the CO₂ actuator centering on the West CP (see 69694). The goal is to reproduce the same optical configuration, for which the position of the WI mirror center on the HWS-INJ wavefront maps has already been determined. The corresponding reference measurement was performed on September 4, 2026, between 17:19 and 17:35 UTC. The data are stored in folder 20260904T1919 (see Fig. 1).However, Francesco noticed that the current alignment differed significantly from that of September 4. Therefore, I decided to repeat the HWS-INJ measurement by switching on the CH to determine the current position of the WI mirror center on the HWS-INJ map.
% CH switching ON
I switched ON the HWS-INJ SLED at 1.42 V
ITF in WI SINGLE BOUNCE +PR aligned
13.29 UTC: HWS-INJ START (20261019T1529)
13.35 UTC: CH ON at high power (WF 8)
13.48 UTC: CH OFF (WF 33 ) and HWS acquisition stopped
The CH appeared clearly in the HWS map (see fig.2).
%%%%%%%%%%
Then, I took advantage of the thermal transient to go to the TCS room and switch off the lasers (69955).
%%%%%%%%%%
% WI PAM switching ON
The first measurement with the WI PAM was performed with the beam in free propagation, without any mask installed.
The voltage applied to the source was gradually increased using voltage ramps lasting several hundred seconds.
Data acquisition started at 14:57 UTC (20261019T1657). At approximately 5 V (T ≈ 430 °C), the OPL induced by the PAM became visible in the HWS maps only after piston and tilt removal (Fig. 3).
At 6.5 V (T ≈ 620 °C), the PAM-induced OPL was clearly visible in the HWS maps even without removing piston and tilt (Fig. 4).
At the end of the shift (20:00 LT), I switched off the actuator. Tomorrow, we will proceed with further characterization measurements.
I left the ITF in WI single bounce+ PR aligned.