Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
Environmental Monitoring (Environmental Monitoring)
fiori, tringali, soldani, paoletti - 17:14 Tuesday 30 September 2025 (67829) Print this report
INJ HVAC speed-up

Last Tuesday (September 23) afternoon we performed a test of speeding up the INJ HVAC supply fan. This is complementary to the slow-down test performed some time ago (https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=60550). The return fan was kept at constant speed reduced mode setting, 20.4 Hz. At each step the air speed out of the supply duct is measured with a hot-wire speed meter, in the first section of the supply duct  after the AHU. 

Start (UTC) SUPPLY frequency (Hz) Air speed (m/s) Air flux (mq/hr)
< 14:15 23 1.1 1415
14:47 26 1.15 1480
14:15 28 1.5 1930
14:31 33 1.78 2290
15:05 23    

The air speed is the average of measurements taken in 6 positions in a grid across the duct section. Air flux is computed as: flux = speed * A * 3600. A is the area of the duct: 0.55 x 0.65 m2.

Inside the Laser Lab the microphone (ENV_LLR_MIC) was placed at 10-20cm distance from one air inlet (ceiling): Picture 1

We realized afterwards that the HVAC_INJ* monitors were off, as reported in https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=67784

However, the INF*PRES sensors measured an overpressure, indicating an increased air flux (Figure 2).

Microphones indicate that substantially the broadband acoustic noise inside the Laser Lab did not change, despite the measured flux into the lab increased by 60%. The only noticeable change in acoustic spectra is a narrow peak moving corresponding to the frequency of the supply fan. This is in Figure 2.

This result is a bit puzzling. Indeed this is in contrast with the observation made many times that when in "nominal" mode (supply at 37Hz, return fan at (30?) Hz)

We make two hypothesis:

  • The supply fan is silent and the acoustic noise is mainly associated to the return fan.
  • the HVAC is actually running in a "crazy" state, as noted in  https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=67740. This onset since the replacement of the HVAC UPS.

Conclusion: The INJ HVAC operation status should be checked. Further tests are needed to better address the noise produced by the INJ HVAC. Similar test to be done with the DET HVAC. 

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
fiori, tringali, schofield, soldani - 18:47 Tuesday 17 March 2026 (68891) Print this report

Last Friday (March 13th) we performed a quick test of slowing down the INJ HVAC. The SUPPLY fan was moved from 23 Hz to 17 Hz (-35%), and the RETURN fan from 20.4 Hz to 17Hz (-20%). The test lasted about 15 minutes. This is similar to the test performed in https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=60553

Figure 1 shows the FREQ,  FLUX and overpressure (PRES) signals. Note that FLUX_EXT and FLUX_IN and FLUX_OUT sensors are evidentely faulty (Davide is notified for replacing those). Sensors measure a reduction of the air flux into the clean areas of: SAS -39%; Atrium(LAR) -34%; LaserLab (LLR) -45%; Minitower(LMR) -55%. And reduction of overpressure of approx 50%. However the duration of the tast has been a bit to short to completely trust these values.

Robert, who was nearby the AHU enclosure, noticed a significant reduction of acoustic and vibration from the fan box itself. 

Microphones in the laser room (LLR), Laser bench (LB) and EIB bench see some reduction:

  • approx. -80% in the range 500 Hz -- 2kHz
  • approx -20% in the range 1 -- 30 Hz
  • not significantly in the range 30 -- 300Hz

We also notice acoustic lines at the fan SUPPLY frequency (23Hz) and third harmonic (69Hz) which are not present when fans are set at 17Hz.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×