Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
Detector Characterisation (Glitches)
mwas - 9:24 Thursday 05 June 2025 (66895) Print this report
High rate of mid-frequency glitches

Figure 1. There is steady high rate of glitches in the mid-frequency band. I do not remember seeing such an issue in the past few years. It is possible that will resolve itself as the adjustment of the interferometer thermal compensation and controls are in progress, but it is not likely. Starting investigating what are the properties of these glitches should start in parallel of the on-going interferometer tuning.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
narnaud - 9:32 Thursday 05 June 2025 (66896) Print this report

FWIW, online Bruco wasn't able to run overnight as it didn't find any long enough segment w/o strong glitch.

Daily UPV finds some SDB1 witness channels but they only account for a few percents of those glitches.

narnaud - 13:42 Thursday 05 June 2025 (66902) Print this report

I've hacked a Virgo DQR script to zoom onto those glitches over a few minutes -- see plot in attachment

  • Top: the Omicron triggers (before time clustering)
  • Middle: the standard Omicron clusters (after time clustering; what we usually call Omicron "triggers")
  • Bottom: an attempt to make 2D (time-frequency) clusters

=> Most of the strong glitches (dark brown) are short in time and very wide in frequency.

Images attached to this comment
direnzo - 18:11 Friday 06 June 2025 (66923) Print this report

I tried to investigate the correlation between these glitches and the auxiliary channels. First, I identified a BRMS channel from Hrec that could serve as a glitch witness: V1:DQ_BRMSMonHrec_BRMS_HREC_HOFT_FREQ_BAND_85_95_Hrec_hoft_16384Hz seemed like a reasonable choice. I then computed correlations with all _mean and _rms trend channels, as described in a previous entry (#66922).
Fairly high correlations were found with the following channels V1:Sc_WI_FF50HZ_*_rms, V1:Sc_BS_CMRF_rms and V1:SDB2_POWERSUPPLY_DBOX_LEFT_DOWN_p12V_rms. However, these channels are flagged as “glitchy” and “Danger,” and are therefore very likely classified as unsafe in the channel safety study performed during ER16: link to the spreadsheet.

One possibility is that the observed correlations arise from these channels "reacting"  to the loud glitches in the strain channel, rather than being causally related to their origin. Therefore, this study does not appear to provide new insights into the origin of these glitches.

As with the range correlation study (#66922), more information may become available once we have access to longer stretches of undisturbed data in DQ Studies operational mode.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×