Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
AdV-PAY (NE and WE Payloads)
melo - 14:54 Wednesday 04 June 2025 (66886) Print this report
Point absorber investigation

I have estimated the relative temperature of the end mirrors point absorbers. For this purpose, I have created a matlab code to measure the temperature of the point absorber w.r.t. the mirror background temperature, excluding the hot points. The calibration in deg C is done using the reference color bar of the thermocamera application. Here are the results:

- Current NE payload:

  • Fig. 1 shows the image of the thermocamera with the ITF locked in CARM_NULL (see #66798);
  • Fig. 2 shows the output of the matlab code. The green rectangle highlights the selected region on the mirror surface used for background temperature calculation. Note that only the uniform mirror area is considered, excluding hot spots, for the mean background temperature. The point absorber is identified as the location with the highest temperature (marked in red). The calculated temperature difference (ΔT) between the PA and the mirror background is 0.7 °C;
  • Fig. 3 provides a 3D reconstruction of the temperature distribution over the mirror surface.

- Old WE payload:

  • Fig. 4 shows the old WE payload with the ITF locked in CARM_NULL (images from #66795);
  • Fig. 5 shows the matlab output code (using the same methodology as for the NE mirror). The measured temperature difference (ΔT) is 1.14 °C;
  • Figs. 6 and 7 display 3D temperature maps reconstructed from the thermocamera images. 

- New WE payload (after intervention #66852):

  • Fig. 8 shows the new WE with the ITF locked (images taken today during CARM_NULL state, see #66887);
  • Fig. 9 shows the MATLAB analysis results. The calculated ΔT between the PA and background is 1.05 °C;
  • Figs. 10 and 11 provide the corresponding 3D temperature maps.

At the time of the measurements of the old WE payload and the current NE the matlab code wasn't ready for use yet. To validate the code’s accuracy, I performed additional measurements today using the Optris thermocamera application. On Fig. 12 we can see the measurements areas defined. "Area 1" represents the mean background temperature within the selected rectangle (23.51 °C), while "Area 2" indicates the maximum temperature at the PA location (24.53 °C). As we can see the temperature difference is 1.02°C, which is very close to the value found with the matlab reconstruction. 

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
melo - 14:41 Thursday 19 June 2025 (67050) Print this report

Under the suggestion of M. Was, instead of comparing the temperature of the point absorbers against the background of the same image, I calculated the difference between the thermocamera image with the ITF locked in CARM_NULL and the image with the ITF unlocked (background reference). This analysis in principle is more accurate w.r.t the previous one as the background pattern is completely removed. First, both images were calibrated in temperature using the colorbar of the thermocamera app (to keep in mind that there is an uncertainty in this calibration since it is taking a 2D image for that purpose) and then the relative temperature of a given area will be the variation ΔT = T_pa(ITF_locked) - T_pa(ITF unlocked), where T_pa is the temperature estimation on the point absorber pixels coordinates. The complete analysis can be found here: VIR-0667A-25.

The results of this analysis is the following:

  • Old WE: ΔT = 0.75 °C (Fig. 1);
  • New WE: ΔT = 0.61 °C (Fig. 2);
  • NE: ΔT = 0.47 °C (Fig. 3);
  • WI: no clear point absorber was identified but a wider hotter area w.r.t the surface of the mirror, as shown in Fig. 4.

 

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×