Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
Environmental Monitoring (Environmental Monitoring)
Paoletti, Fiori - 16:36 Tuesday 29 April 2025 (66658) Print this report
Dedicated WEB magnetic injection

Today we injected a WEB-only magnetic sweep to check some clues about the “comb” noise that appeared recently.

Start 12:36:28 UTC

Stop 12:46:32 UTC

 

Analisys will follow

Comments to this report:
fiori - 18:30 Wednesday 30 April 2025 (66674) Print this report

A first look at the data shows:

  • no anomalous behaviour related to the present excess noises of hrec. That is, no anomalous excitation of peaks in hrec: see Figures 1 and 2

 A coupling function shall be extracted and compared to the previous.

Images attached to this comment
Tringali, Fiori, Paoletti - 18:52 Friday 02 May 2025 (66695) Print this report

Some comments on the magnetic coupling functions (CFs) measured since the beginning of the O4b run.

  • After the mirror installation, the WE magnetic injections performed on April 29 (ENV shift) and 30 (Autometed injections) show a broadband worsening of the magnetic coupling compared to previous injections, as shown in Figure 1 (green and light blue asterisk markers), and in the Hrec spectrograms (top: after, bottom: before the installation of the new mirror), Figure 2.
     
  • The WE noise projection (after the mirror installation) indicates a possible limitation of the sensitivity in the range 40-80 Hz, Figue 3.
     
  • Figure 4 shows: 
    • for frequencies below ~50 Hz, the slope of the coupling functions is approximately 1/f² and appears consistent with that of the previous injections;
    • the slope of the CFs is approximately 1/f in the frequency range of ~50–200 Hz.
       
  • After the installation of the mirror, the NEB CF also appears to have worsened for frequencies below  ~40 Hz, Figure 5 (right plot, green asterisk markers). However, the magnetic noise projection lies below the sensitivity curve and is therefore not a limiting factor, Figure 6.
     
  • Regarding the far-field magnetic injections in the CEB, no significant variations are observed before and after the mirror intervention, Figure 7.
     
  • Taking into account the coupling functions computed before the installation of the WE mirror, the following can be observed (see Figure 5):
    • the CF values of the WE building are higher than those of the NE building; 
    • for frequencies ~10-20 Hz, the CFs of the NE building exhibit a steeper slope compared to those of the WE building;
    • a reduction in CF values and a change in slope are observed during the WE magnetic injections performed on September 23, October 7 and 21, and November 4, 2024.  This behavior is due to an increase in the SNR of the magnetometer for frequencies above ~50 Hz during the injections, Figure 8 (high SNR) and Figure 9 (low SNR).


Note: CF values, upper limits, and main figures of merit are collected in the Git repository: https://git.ligo.org/virgo/environmental/couplingfunctions/-/tree/main/O4/Magnetic?ref_type=heads

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×