Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
AdV-COM (Flat noise)
Allocca, Chiummo, Fiori, Mantovani, Paoletti - 21:00 Monday 28 January 2019 (44588) Print this report
Effect of 56MHz amplitude modulation in Hrec

Today we wanted to investigate the effect of noise injection on the modulation index of the 56MHz sidebands. In order to do this, Federico arranged some hardware to inject noise downstream wrt the dedicated LNFS.

More details on the hardware will come in a dedicated entry.

The box used a DAC channel from the "ENVnoise" process to be powered, which also allowed us to inject noise (both a single line and shaped noise)

At beginning we realized a general attenuation of the modulation index was induced by Federico's box, so we compensated for it by increasing the modulation index by 2 dB throughout the lock acquisition steps. Also, we had to tune the longitudinal and angular phases and the offsets of the AA signals. Besides that, everything went smoothly and we reached easily Low Noise 3. The general sensitivity was worsened by the insertion of Federico's box, which was already known to be source of white noise.

The injections were made by sending lines at several frequencies, all with the same amplitude, and then by sending colored noise in two different bandwidths. We noticed a strong dependence of the antisymmetric port induced noise on the alignment set points, therefore we first optimized the alignment working point and then started the noise injections.

Below the list of GPS, duration 250 s

Single line

GPS Frequency [Hz] Amplitude
1232724039 22 5e-5
1232723665 93 5e-5
1232722303 127 5e-5
1232723313 182 5e-5
1232728265 263 5e-5
1232722778 378 5e-5
1232724369 576 5e-5

 

Broadband injections

GPS Band Amplitude
1232726609 50Hz - 750Hz 1e-5
1232726932 50Hz - 750Hz 2e-5
1232727297 20Hz - 980Hz 2e-5
1232727673 20Hz - 980Hz 5e-6

In figure 1, hrec at the different GPS times when the single line was injected is shown.

In figure 2 the transfer function between the channel DAQ_EOM_56MHz_mag_raw (which monitors the 56MHz amplitude and the injected noise) and Hrec is shown. The blue and the red curve correspond to the two broadband noise injections in the band 50Hz - 750Hz, while the black squares are the amplitude of the single injected lines. In the frequency range between ~30Hz and ~600Hz the curve can be fitted with a curve linearly proportional to f.

 

At the end of the shift we also tried to reduce the DARM offset in order to highlight any dependence of the coupling of the 56MHz RIN to the dark fringe:

Darm set GPS
3e-4 1232728733
1.5e-4 1232728950

This was done with Federico's box still inserted in the chain, so there was a flat noise on the index of modulation. In figure 3, the hrec curves recorded at the different DARM_SETs. It looks like the coupling of this noise to the dark fringe depends on the darm offset, but deeper analysis is needed on this.

At the end of the shift, we rolled back the hardware, the longitudinal and angular phases and the alignment setpoints. We also tested the lock acquisition up to LN3 and found no problems.

A proper analysis will be done shortly.

 

5e-5

 

5e-5
5e-5
Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
Paoletti - 22:07 Monday 28 January 2019 (44590) Print this report

Useful numbers:

the 56MHz EOM monitor reading system has a floor noise of about 1e-8 V/sqrt(Hz), quite flat from 1Hz and above. This has been tested in a period when the RF signal (56MHz modulation) was unplugged; everything above this number is added AM noise: from the LNFS itself in standard conditions, or from the AM modulator harware during this test.

In the attached plot the BLUE curve is this ADC background noise (to be verified, seems very low ...), the PURPLE curve is the standard LNFS configuration, the ORANGE curve is when the AM modulator is connected (no AM modulation signal sent), the GOLD curve is during a broadband AM noise injection.

From these numbers should be possible to have a noise projection

 

As reference also following is the timetable of the tests:

 

28/01/2019 (all time are UTC)

Reference: from 03:00 to 04:00 lock index 160 (useful period for noise floor measurement in standard conditions)

Up  to 08:35 UTC standard working setup

From 08:40 to 09:45 tests

From 09:49 to 09:53 no RF applied to EOM (useful period for ADC noise floor measurement)

AM modulator plugged from 09:56 to 16:49

From 16:52 UTC standard working setup

Locked from 12:42 to 13:36

First 127Hz line from 12:55 to 13:48

Locked from 14:18 to 15:31

From 14:20 to 14:40 locked and no injections (useful period for AM modulator hardware residual noise floor)

From 14:41 to 15:26 many lines injected

Locked from 15:50 to 16:48

From 16:02 to 16:28 noise injections (flat noise, various bandwidth and various level)

From 16:29 to 16:36 last 263Hz line injection

 

The AM modulator is an Analog Devices AD834, followed with a +20dB broadband RF amplifier.

Images attached to this comment
mantovani, paoletti, chiummo - 9:52 Tuesday 29 January 2019 (44594) Print this report

Using the measured TF and the clean data period the noise projection of the 56MHz RIN noise can be obtained (~48MPc). From figure 1 it is visible that the EOM 56MHz noise is below the sensitivity by only a factor ~3 in the 100 - 1000Hz region.

Moreover the coupling can be worsened by the mistuining of the alignment wp (to be better investigated).

Images attached to this comment
mwas - 7:42 Wednesday 30 January 2019 (44612) Print this report
Figure 1, shows the 56MHz RIN injection at 127Hz. The line is clearly visible in B1s1. Then in h(t) it has sidebands at +/-200mHz, that are only a factor 2 smaller than the line itself.
However comparing hoft with hoft_raw (hoft with B2_8MHz subtraction), it is clear that the line is being subtracted by a factor ~6, and that side-bands are actually over a factor 10 below the line.
The same factor 10 between line and sideband is also visible in B1_PD2_Blended.

Figure 2 shows the 56Mhz RIN injection at 93Hz, the sidebands are more clear there, but still more than a factor 10 below the line itself.

Figure 3, shows the 56MHz RIN injection at 263Hz, there might be +/-200mHz side-bands there, a factor 30 below the line, but is hard to say as there seem to be just a broad bump

Figure 4, shows the 56MHz RIN injection at 576Hz, the +/-200mHz sidebands are clearly visible a factor ~30 below the line

It is reassuring that the coupling modulation has an impact a factor 10 below the coupling itself, as it means a simple subtraction of B1s1_PD1_Blended can work up to a factor 10.
But it would be good to understand what modulates the coupling (most likely relative alignment between carrier and 56MHz), to allow better subtraction of 56MHz RIN from the sensitivity.
Images attached to this comment
Singh, Arnaud, Allocca, Chiummo, Mwas, Fiori - 17:46 Tuesday 05 February 2019 (44735) Print this report

The analysis for the side bands around the injected signals (44588) was done using code developed for this purpose by Barbara Patricelli, for LSC_DARM as target channel and channels mentioned in the attached Channel list.

The process was carried out using ENV_NOISE_CEB_EEroom as the modulation channel.

The plots for 93 Hz, 127 Hz, 182 Hz, 263 Hz 378 Hz are attached with the respective list of highest coherence ranking Channels.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
mwas - 20:20 Wednesday 06 February 2019 (44770) Print this report
In the analysis of the sidebands of the injected lines, B1s2 shows up as the bilinear coupling factor.
This would mean that to subtract the 56MHz RIN we could use B1s1*(low pass B1s2) instead of just B1s1, and that it should work better.
It also make sense, we have seen in the past that the power on B1s2 on slow time scales (hours) is increasing when the 56MHz RIN coupling increases. This analysis suggest the coupling is proportional to B1s2, and that this works also on shorter time scales (fraction of a second) not only on hours time scale.
Search Help
×

Warning

×