20/05
Yesterday, while relocking the SL, we noticed that the reflection was quite low: 0.22 V instead of the usual 0.38 V.
When the NeoVan was seeded only by the ML, we obtained higher power than when it was seeded with both the ML and SL.
The SL PUMP DC signals, which monitor the pumping diode power at the output of the fiber in the SL head, were also higher.
This indicates a general misalignment of the SL cavity that needed to be cured.
Since the temperature of the NeoVan was increasing, we decided to slightly reduce the pumping diode current overnight while keeping the SL running, hoping that thermalization during the night would improve the situation.
21/05
No thermalization effect was observed overnight.
In the morning we held a meeting with Walid and Margherita to analyze the situation. We agreed that the beam of the pumping diodes needed to be realigned inside the crystals. Since the power was already quite high, we were expeting a slight misalignment that could be recovered by ajusting the lenses in front of the cavity (at least as a first try).
We then went to the laser lab in the afternoon to perform the adjustment. By tuning the vertical and horizontal position of the lenses, we managed to recover the reflection signal up to 0.32 V.
We did not fully recover the nominal value, which was quite expected since we only had a limited number of degrees of freedom available compared to the full possible misalignment that may have occurred.
We also measured the slave locking bandwidth (14:51:02) and found 1.15 MHz, significantly lower than the 2.1 MHz measured last time we did it. This further confirms the presence of a misalignment of the cavity.
Also, visually, we observed that the beam was not propagating correctly through the optics toward the NeoVan, so we decided to flip the mirror located between the SL and the amplifier.
Peltier situation:
When the safety interlock triggered on 08/05, the PID temperature controllers did not stop sending correction signals. This was verified this morning by manually triggering the safety system.
Our hypothesis is that, during the afternoon of the 08/05, without cooling from the chiller on the hot side and while the system was still attempting to cool the crystal, the Peltier element of Crystal 1 was receiving 2A and experienced an overall temperature increase. This eventually resulted in a general temperature rise of both peltier, both crystals and likely the whole cavity.