Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
AdV-INJ (General opto-mechanical layout, common parts construction, Installation and pre-commissioning)
nocera - 11:03 Wednesday 09 September 2026 (69715) Print this report
LNFS Saga

R. Cavalieri, F. Nocera, P. Spinicelli

Brief recap on recent events and current status concerning our sideband generators a.k.a. LNFS (Spectradynamics' LNFS-100).

We have purchased a total of four identical 3-output synthesizers over the years (starting in 2011) and we have been using two of them at the same time to generate our 4 sideband frequencies for a very long time (the entire O4 and even before that), namely 6, 8, and 56 MHz (Synth1) and 22 MHz (Synth2).

Following Feb 28th blackout, one of the two used syntesizers (Synth1) failed and had to be swapped with a spare (https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=68788), let's call it Synth3. The failure consisted in a problem at the power on which has not been observed ever since during the following months of tests and monitoring in the Lab.

Starting on Jul 11th, Synth3 showed "additional noise" on both 6 and 56 MHz (https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=69359) and, for that reason, was in turn swapped back with Synth1, on Jul 15th. No tests in the lab have been performed on Synth3 since to verify and understand whether or not the problem was reproducible.

Synth1 too proved to be noisier than one would have liked (https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=69656) and therefore the idea of putting in a different one in its place popped up. This was what we set out to do yesterday.

First attempt: we tried Synth3 which worked just fine when in "Local Mode" (i.e., when not controlled via RS-232) but did not when in "Remote Mode", behavior never seen so far. 
Second attempt saw the swap of Synth3 with Synth4, the one we use in our Lab setup to test and characerize RF devices before intergation in Virgo, which failed miserably since the device did not even turn on.

The solution found to allow commissioning activities to go on has been to use Synth2 to generate 6, 8, and 56 and accept temporarily a slightly degraded performance (which has no impact on the ITF performance) on the 22 MHz, now generated with Synth1.

For completeness, it is useful to remind the original (AdV) 22 MHz sideband does not need to have the low phase-noise performance offered by the LNFS-100 and used to be generated with a different, garden variety DDS; we could revert to that at any time if required. As it often happens, at some point in the past we tried out the solution with the LNFS for the 22 "for a test" and we never went back.
 

Comments to this report:
carbognani, spinicelli - 11:48 Wednesday 09 September 2026 (69716) Print this report

In addition to this change of LNFS devices, we had to change also the Lnfs100 server to take into account that we now need to remotely control only one LNFS. In particular, we reverted the python scritp PyLnfs100.py to the version used before the addition of the 81Mhz sideband (back in 2022). 

The server has been restarted and running without troubles since yesterday afternoon.

masserot, nocera, spinicelli - 17:32 Wednesday 09 September 2026 (69721) Print this report

This plot , and its zoom,  shows the demodulated signals related to the LNFS generator and the EOM monitoring:

  • the  *_raw_dFreq channel is the derivative of phase of the demodulated channel
  • Usually the difference between the *_dFreq_min and *_dFreq_max is tiny 
  • but around  2026-09-08-18h10m_UTC the first time for a short period  the frequency became different and noisy
    • the *_dFreq red cuves are the *_dFreq  signals low-pass filtered at 300Hz
  • and around the 2026-09-08-18h16m_UTC ,the frequency difference and the  noise reappered  to remain :
    • the *_raw_dFreq signal is the derivative of the phase computed with the outputs of the demodulation board
    • the *_phi signal is the phase after the rotation using the LNFS demodulated channels and the *_dFreq the derivative of this phase
    • One can see that the noise is well present on the *_raw_dFreq of  the SIB2_RFC_PD1_6MHz and of the INJ_EAB_EOM_TRA_6MHz an it s not removed by the LNFS rotation 

The last plot shows the LNFS phase noise for the 6Mz and the 56MHz for according the LNFS devce used 

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×