Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
Injection system (General activities)
derossi, spinicelli - 15:17 Tuesday 22 July 2025 (67348) Print this report
ML crystal temperature change - mode hop check

In order to try to understand the origin of the inj unlocks which occurred last week (fig. 1 shows an example of ML glitch prior to an unlock), we wanted to check whether we were close to a mode hop of the ML.

Prior to start we measured the SL Transfer Function, finding an UGF of about 298kHz and phase -79° (attached fig. n°7).

Following the procedure reported in the entry 50944, we opened the ML thermal corrections loop (and the corrections kept the constant value of -0.128 V BsX ML TH CORR).

The initial temperature of the ML crystal was 22.7°C. We found a mode hop at 22.2°C and the following at 25.2°C. We decided to increase the crystal temperature from 22.7°C to 24.1°C in order to be better centered wrt the two mode hops.

Moreover, when we tried to realign the beam in the PSTAB AOM we observed strange structure close to the TEM 01 mode of the PMC (#67303). Since we thought it could be a ML mode hop we made the test of changing the ML crystal temperature while scanning the PMC and looking and this structure: no change in shape nor position was observed, so we can exclude that it is linked to a ML mode hop.

GPS LT ML crystal temperature  comments
10:48 LT 22.7 °C fig. 2 e 3 - initial temperature setpoint
10:54:20 LT 23.2°C  
10:58:05 LT 23.7°C  
11:00:45 LT 24.2°C  
11:06 LT 24.7 °C  
11:07 LT 25.2°C mode hop fig. 4 e 5
11:12 LT 22.5°C  
11:13 LT 22.2°C mode hop
11:16 LT 24°C    
11:19 LT 24.1°C final temperature setpoint fig.6

 

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
vardaro - 1:27 Friday 25 July 2025 (67359) Print this report

Today I realized that the SQZ PLLs where no more locked after this intervention. I found the locking point of MAIN anc CC PLLs, for SC I have the impression that the laser switched off again (to be checked)
MAIN PLL: was moved from 25773 to 23800 
CC PLL:     was moved from 25820 to 23825

I managed to lock the CC PLL for a 10 mins and then it never locked again (to be checked with a spectrum analyzer). Also the main PLL is a way more instable than usual. It continue to unlock. I have the impression that we are working in multimode regime but it does not seems from SHG scan. The power of TEM00 mode is decreased in the new config (fg 1)

Considering the calbration of the MAIN PLL Peltier, we know that with 65536 bit we can do 16.666V this means that too coover the 1.4K done with PSL we should pass from 25800 to 31400. Around that point the main PLL status pass trough an high state but I don't manage to lock the PLL. Check with a spectrum analyzer.

The check of the squeezer should be possible by putting SQZ MAIN in DOWN then restore the old setpoint of both PLL in the GUI, switch off the MAIN PLL Fast loop and lock by hand the CC PLL.
But this configuration prevents all the injection in the interferometer. 

To solve the situation it is worth a check with a spectrum analyzer in DET Eroom and after that understand if we can work on this point, otherwise the PSL temperature should be moved in case of one of the SQZ laser is in a multimode configuration

Images attached to this comment
spinicelli - 15:28 Friday 25 July 2025 (67372) Print this report

After few days of no-problem, this afternoon the IMC started to have an unlock crysis.

I checked the TF of the IMC (fig. 1) but it seems to be ok. However,  I reduced a bit the gain in order to increase the phase margin (fig. 2) but apparently it didn't help reducing the unlocks.

Images attached to this comment
zendri, toffano - 23:40 Tuesday 05 August 2025 (67444) Print this report

Today, with the help of a spectrum analyzer, we restore the squeezer MAIN  and CC  PLLs. The previous entry's (67359) setting probably   referred to a spurious beat signal which was very faint (about  -25 dBm).

With the new settings:

MAIN  PLL:  31594

CC PLL:       31437

the PLLs lock are stable in time. While we had no  time to work on the SC PLL, which however is not used in this period.

We also used part of the shift time to calibrate the laser temperature versus the DAQ bit count and, in the case of the main PLL, also the frequency shift to the bit count. The results are shown in the attached figures.

With these calibrations we were able to estimate that to restore the PLLs we had to increase the temperature of the lasers respectively by

MAIN PLL Temp increment 1.49 Kelvin

CC PLL Temp increent 1.43 Kelvin

which is compatible with the increase in temperature of the main laser reported in #67348

Non-image files attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×