Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
AdV-SAT (Long SAs Upgrade Installation (End Towers))
ruggi - 11:20 Tuesday 28 February 2023 (59075) Print this report
More details about the noise in the channel Sc_WE_MIR_Z

As shown in a previous entry, a strange event detected by the channel Sc_WE_MIR_Z (and the others generated by MIR_PSDI) is coincident with a loss of dark fringe alignment, mainly due to a rotation of WE in TY. As we can see in fig 1, the coincidence is not perfect: the aligment problem occurs a few secons erlier than the noise.

In fig 2 we can see that the channels generated by PSDI are not the only affected by the noise: Sc_WE_tyAA is a channel generated in the same board (ScWEPSDi), sent to the master board and then to the DAQ. It makes the same path of the channels form PSDI, but has no correlation with that device.

In fig 3 we have a zoom of a noisy event: both signals goes quickly towards zero. Considering that DSPs run at 40kHz and DAQ shows the signals at 10 kHz, this is compatible with the loss of one sample at 40 kHz.

Observing the same event when the ITF is not locked and MIR_Z is used in loop to damp the mirror, we can notice that the noise dose not enter the loop correction (fig 4, fig 5). This means that the same channel, sent to a different board (MIR coil driver), is not noisy. It looks like a problem of communication between PSDi board and master board.

Anyway, the problem is no more there since a couple of days: the debugging is a bit difficult.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
ruggi - 18:26 Monday 06 March 2023 (59152) Print this report

Today the WE DSP code has been modified in order to perform the control of DIFFp in a different board. This change had obviously no impact on the communication problem related to PSDI board, but removed the problems of angular disturbance at CARM NULL. A few modification of the code have to be done in order to replicate all the functions currently performed by PSDI, but in principle a control code free from troubles can be implemented.

Images attached to this comment
Boschi, Negri - 17:36 Wednesday 08 March 2023 (59180) Print this report

After a series of tests performed during yesterday maintenance (a swap between PSDi and PSDm DSP boards SCSI cables followed by a reset of the PSDi board), this afternoon we decided to replace the PSDi board (serial #41071) with a new one (serial #45271). Unfortunately, after the crate reboot required for the intervention, the board connected to F7 LVDTs (serial #43144) stopped to be reachable on the network and had to be replaced as well with a spare (serial #41038). The payload and F7 signals have been checked, the various control loops have been closed successfully and the configuration files of the relative TANGO servers have been updated. Even though the system is now working properly, this event highlights the risk involved in doing any kind of intervention involving reboots on the DSP crates.

Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×