Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
AdV-ISC (Commissioning up to first full interferometer lock)
bersanetti, ruggi, casanueva - 2:02 Thursday 30 August 2018 (42579) Print this report
COMMp loop closed, DIFFp driving matrix improved, tests with BS in full bandwidth

Today we worked on the improvement of the alignment scheme:

  • we implemented a different scheme with respect to the past, in order to close the COMMp loop and not have it interfere with the galvo loop of the B5_QD2 sensor:
    • during lock acquisition, we set a relatively high gain for the galvo loop just before re-enabling it (currently, 1e-2 with proper sign for V/H);
    • with the galvo properly in place we can close the usual PR (full bandwidth) and BS (drift control) loops;
    • once we ask OMC1 to lock, we get the current values of SDB2_B5_QD2_GALVO_[V,H]_CORR, and set them as offsets to the galvo themselves, using a slow ramp (60 s); concurrently, we decrease of a factor 100 the gains for the galvo loop, in order basically to discharge the DC of the loop and fix it in place;
    • once we get to LOW_NOISE_3 we engage the COMMp loop using the usual DC signals with no offsets;
  • this allowed to stabilize the dark fringe and reduce a bit some structures in the sensitivity curve;
  • this also allowed to improve the driving matrix of the DIFFp loop, which helps reducing the 1.5 Hz resonance in the signals (as observed also on SDB1); all of this is now automatically done once in LOW_NOISE_3, 20 seconds after closing the COMMp loop itself;
  • we did some tests with the BS loop in full bandwidth:
    • we managed to close it with no issues, but manually and after a long time in LOW_NOISE_3;
    • the automatic engagement of the loop failed, even if waiting for 5 minutes once in LOW_NOISE_3; the work on such loop will continue on Friday, along with the investigation on a possible different sensor with B4_QD2.

Side note about the OMCs:

  • during the shift we had at first some problem locking OMC1 as there was little power on B1s2, and Romain helped us by reducing the threshold;
  • then, following the increase of the 56 MHz modulation amplitude we retuned the DARM offset while we are on RF signal, as it changed calibration; oddly enough, the problem showed up only this morning and not in the past days;
  • we recovered the usual ~ 1.5 mW on B1s2 when OMC1 locks , but this is not stable over time, and in the following attempts the same level was not reached every time (see for example the locks around 22:10 and 22:27 UTC); I wonder if the change in the galvo configuration may have an impact on this... If needed, we can move it from OMC1 locking sequence to the OMC2 one.
Comments to this report:
mwas - 8:15 Thursday 30 August 2018 (42580) Print this report
This morning around 6:10 UTC added the opening of B1s1 shutter when OMC1 acquire start in OMC_LOCK metatron. This might help with understanding the variation in OMC1 transmitted power during lock.
ruggi - 11:42 Thursday 30 August 2018 (42582) Print this report

The attached plots compare data of yesterday night and data of this night, after the work on alignment loops.

fig 1 - fig 6: in loop alignment error signals

fig 7 - fig 9: powers

fig 10 - fig 12: longitudinal error signals

The main improvement comes from the engagement of COMMp. The use of a better driving for DIFFp_TY (a combination of WI and WE, instead of WE only) makes a difference too; this driving did not work without the engagement of COMMp, due to an oscillation below 100 mHz. As a general remark, the increase of power and consequent increase of the optical spring makes the operations to reach the AA final state more critical. Considering that the power in the cavities has been increased only by a factor of 1.5, an hypothetical passage to the ADV final design would probably produce complications not easy to face.

A small remark: the peak at 50 mHz in fig 12 was due to a high gain of the slow loop wich controls the transversal position of PR.

Using B1p_DC (figure 7) as figure of merit for the quality of  angular control, we have to say that in some small region now the behavior is worsen. To be investigated.

Concerning the improvement of DARM (figure 10) we have to underline the reduction of the 9.8 peak (roll of the mirror). This is due to the engagement of NI and NE roll dampers, which is linked to the engagement of AA (COMMp) of north arm. At the same time the roll local control is moved to a less noisy filter, which should have reduced a bit the noise around 10 Hz. The last step of the low frequency optimization, the gain reduction of F7 TX/TZ dampers, has been tried, but it was clear that the gain used in june is too low, because the 0.415 Hz pendulum mode started to grow. This is probably one more side effect of the increase of power.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×