Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
AdV-PSL (Laser Bench setup)
Cleva - 9:57 Tuesday 31 July 2018 (42255) Print this report
Misalignement at the AMP diagnobox?

Introduction: we need to have a good power monitor of the neoVAN in order to assess the PMC throughput and the possible intra cavity loss

the neoVAN power is monitored into the associated diagnobox (PSL_AMP signlas) and requires the AMP_QD_NF and FF quadrants to be centered to keep the beam centered on the single element PD which delivers AMP_DC signal.

Issue:

After the work on PSL and the accidental misalignement of the seeder (42148 ) the AMP_QD signals of the diagnobox were quite offseted due to the misalignement of the neoVAN beam.

we see that before the accident the DC signals of the 2 QD PD and the single elt PD gives the ~same signals (see plot 1, phase A, see plot 2 for the legend)

after the accident misalignment the 3 signals fail to give the same value (calibrated in watt), which is reasonnable since the beam is misaligned on the diagnobox: see the 4 error signals of the QD (those 4 signals are centered arbitrarilly around 30 W on the plot for display puprose). (see plot 1, phase B, see plot 2 for the legend)

Some work has been done to get the beam realigned on the quadrant of the diagnobox ( 42193 ).

The signals of the QD seems better centered (around 30 W which means close to zero, and at least as good as before the accident), but still the 3 DC signals are still different, while we were expecting to recover the situation befor the accident. (see plot 1 phase C, see plot 2 for the legend)

I was informed that the optical density has been moved and that is has lead to some power variation, but this would impact the 3 signals in the same way I guess and is of no help to explain our specific issue.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
cleva - 10:12 Tuesday 31 July 2018 (42256) Print this report

Still it is visible that after the "accident" the neoVAN has lost ~ 6 W:

A likely explaination is that the seeder wihich could be better aligned altough the beam profile seems quite reasonnable

 

 

 

genin - 17:11 Tuesday 31 July 2018 (42262) Print this report

Note that during the seeder realignment we were able to get much more light on AMP_DC (2 or 3% more) but with a bad amplifier output beam profile.

At that time, we decided to align the seeder to get the best beam profile at the output of the amplifier.

We can still plan some futher realignment steps at the end of the "monitoring" period.

Search Help
×

Warning

×