Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
AdV-COM (AdV commissioning (1st part) )
bersanetti, martynov, swinkels, hoak - 1:27 Tuesday 23 May 2017 (37686) Print this report
MICH noise investigations

Today we performed some investigations in order to figure out the excess noise in MICH and its possible causes:

  • for the first part of the shift we focused on the B4 signals, the one coming from SSFS and the standard SPRB one:
    • we tried to use both the B4_56MHz_I signals  for the SSFS, the SPRB one for the low frequency branch (IMC) and the usual SSFS one for the high frequency branch; however the switch for the low frequency region did not work. This could be due to the different structures which appear in the two signals, who were after all one of the signs of something going on with the B4 sensor; the TF between the two spans over different orders of magnitude in the whole frequency range, so a straightforward way to to the hand-off is not obvious; a follow-up test could be to try the hand-off before the SSFS boost is engaged, as the difference between the signals is less significant in that case, and then engage the SSFS boost;
    • as a secondary trial we switched the MICH sensor, from the SSFS B4_56MHz_Q signal to its SPRB counterpart; the TF between the two was flat as already measured before, and the hand-off was consequently smooth, but no changes were seen on MICH itself or on the other B4 sensors/quadratures;
  • at this point we investigated other error signals for the MICH loop, in order to try and find if the same structures appeared with other sensors; in the end we switched MICH to B2_56MHz_Q and we compared several configurations for MICH, which are reported in the Figure:
    • MAGENTA is the usual MICH sensor in dark fringe;
    • BLACK is the simple Michelson in DC readout, which is well below the usual spectrum and with most of the structures not present;
    • GREEN is MICH on B2_56MHz_Q: what is striking here is the much higher bump in the low frequency region; it is unclear if this means that B2_56MHz is just a worse sensor than B4_56MHz_Q, or if they are actually sensing something different and the B4 signal is in some way affected by the SSFS loop;
    • RED and BLUE are the error signal and the correction for the B2_56MHz_Q lock;
  • During the shift the B4 demodulation phases moved again a little w.r.t. this morning, and the SSFS phase offset is still not linearly added to the SPRB phase for the SSFS signals;

Summing up, there is no clear conclusion yet on the source of this noise: next steps could be working more on the two branches of the SSFS using the different sensors, looking at different MICH configurations at dark fringe, or study the MICH sensors in different/simpler configurations (Michelson, CITF).

 

While I was trying to restore the ITF for the night, I found that it got stuck in the FmodErr sequence, often looping between the different FmodErr states (THERMAL_CORRECTION, LNFS_TUNING and MC_TUNING); after selecting manually IMC_RESTORED I left the ITF in LOCKED_RECOMBINED hoping not to trigger the loop again during the night.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments to this report:
mwas - 7:45 Tuesday 23 May 2017 (37687) Print this report
The bump at ~15 Hz that appears when using the B2 56MHz signal reminds of the coupling of phase noise we had before both quadrature of the B4 56MHz signal were used for MICH/SSFS. So this could be just the phase noise coupling (either in B2 or B4) when the two quadratures are not controlled together. A check would be to look for coherence with atomic clock demodulation signal. A note is that currently the B4 signal and atomic clock signal are using the system with the lower phase noise installed a couple of weeks ago. But this is not the case for B2.
martynov - 10:24 Tuesday 23 May 2017 (37689) Print this report
We used SPRB path of the B4 photodiode as an out of loop sensor for the frequency (I) and MICH (Q) noise. Since MICH servo is low bandwidth, SSFS and SPRB signals are fully coherent and dominated by the actual MICH noise. The situation is different for the I quadrature. High bandwidth frequency servo suppresses laser frequency fluctuations, and we see only sensing noise (plus Q quadrature coupling) on the out of loop sensor. Attached plot shows SSFS and SPRB signals. Structured features of the SPRB I at 30-200 Hz can be explained by MICH coupling. However, the level of the residual signal is significantly higher than the dark noise of the photodiodes. Also, PD dark noise is common between the two paths. We think this noise couples during the demodulation process and plan to investigate more on this.
Non-image files attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×