Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
AdV-ISC (Commissioning up to first full interferometer lock)
mantovani, derossi, pinto, spinicelli, rocchi - 15:56 Wednesday 07 September 2022 (56958) Print this report
ISC/TCS tuning and DCP online monitor

We found the ITF in CARM 0

we started to characterize the config. 160Hz of DCP (including the OS it comes from 190Hz).

the BS has been engaged with phi0 = 1.35 for both.

Aligning the SR vs 112MHz we could not improve the DCP.

We have remeasured the DCP and tuned the LSC_MONI.DARM_HF_LINE_PHI_SET from 0.6 to 0.46 to find the same value. We need to understand if the LSC_DARM_DCP_TEST_FREQ is reasonable or not.

10:05 LT DAS tuning done (Alessio will add more details)

the 56MHz sidebands shape are improved @ CARM0 (not anymore the vertical structure on LSB 56MHz), see Figure 1 and 2 CITF yesterday and today, 3 and 4 Carm 0 yesterday and today.

We've aligned increasing the pole from 190 to 297Hz of DCP  (measured with DARM noise @12:43UTC and the Michal script see Figure 5). The online channel instead is not working (just ingnore the channel at the moment).

In Figure 6 it is visibel that the B1p_QD1_V_50MHz_Q is well sensing the BS (with pi/2 of optimal phase). I changed then the phase in the ini file from 1.35 to -0.22 (to be checked tomorrow, it could be a pi of difference).

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
mwas - 12:25 Thursday 08 September 2022 (56970) Print this report

Figure 1 shows the issue with the double cavity monitor under test. The phase measured changes by 0.1rad, while the UGF derived phase changes by 0.5rad in the opposite direction. Looking back at the code, I think the issue is that DCP test monitor is demodulating LSC_DARM, while it should be demodulating LSC_DARM_ERR.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×