Reports of 1569 Clear search Modify search
Optical characterization (Optical characterization)
irace, bersanetti, nardecchia, gouaty - 20:09 Tuesday 14 May 2024 (64257) Print this report
OMC scan in CARM_NULL_1F

Figure 1 shows the scan of the OMC performed from 17h05 utc to 17h30 utc, after waiting for 1 hour in CARM_NULL_1F.

Figure 2 shows a zoom of this scan around a Free Spectral Range.

In this FSR, assuming a calibration factor of about 4800 for B1_PD3, we have: ~48 mW on the first order mode, ~24 mW on the second order mode, ~125 mW on the third order modes, ~170 mW on the fourth order mode, around ~40 mW on each of the 5th and 6th order modes, ... Overall, all high order modes are reduced compared to the measurement performed one week ago ( https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=64206 ).

Focusing on the 2nd order mode which appears 4 times during the scan, its power is ranging between 24 and 40 mW which is quite similar to the range of values found last week.

Images attached to this report
AdV-ISC (LSC Noise Budget)
bersanetti - 2:29 Sunday 12 May 2024 (64230) Print this report
SSFS noise injections exciting violin modes of the arms mirrors

Tonight I found the ViolinModes DMS flag red, with the subflag related to the first harmonics (~860-900 Hz) being the one over threshold. Looking into it (Figure) it looks like the SSFS noise injections induce an excitation of the modes.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
mwas - 12:03 Monday 13 May 2024 (64237) Print this report

Notches are the best form of shaping for narrow resonant modes. Are there notches at the first harmonic (~900Hz) of the violin modes in the DARM and CARM corrections? I have some doubts that the laser frequency noise can directly excite violin modes. A contamination by frequency noise into the CARM and DARM correction seems more likely.

AdV-TCS (Ring Heater)
nardecchia, bersanetti, sposito - 8:00 Thursday 09 May 2024 (64216) Print this report
RH power change-Step 1

As planned, this morning at 5.50 UTC, the ETM RH powers have been changed with the iTF in 'adjusting'.

The old and new values are summarized below:

STEP 1: RH power change 

NE

WE

+100 mW on the NE 

-100 mW on the WE 

6.9→7.0 W

[16.04→ 16.14 V]

8.4 → 8.3 W

[17.67 → 17.57 V]

 

Comments to this report:
mwas - 15:42 Monday 13 May 2024 (64240) Print this report

Figure 1 There has been no visible impact from the RH step on the amount of DARM signal on B1s (OMC rejection port demodulated at 491.3Hz).

Figure 2 There was much more oscillation on the B1s DARM signal, and this might be due to the etalon effect which after the longer maintenance and the few hours of measurement on Tuesday afternoon was oscillating more.

Images attached to this comment
sorrentino - 14:38 Tuesday 14 May 2024 (64252) Print this report

The impact of Etalon on B1s DARM line is clearly visible on data from the last week of April, when the Etalon had larger oscillations.

Images attached to this comment
sorrentino - 14:44 Tuesday 14 May 2024 (64253) Print this report

The ETM RH differential step had a small effect to lower the B1p power, which partly compensated the increase after the last Etalon step. No effect is visible on the SSFS coupling to Hrec at low frequency.

Images attached to this comment
Optical characterization (Optical characterization)
nardecchia, bersanetti, derossi, gosselin, gouaty, melo, magazzu - 19:43 Tuesday 07 May 2024 (64205) Print this report
ITF WP characterization

The goal of the shift was to characterize the ITF working point with the following RH powers:

RH powers 

NE

WE

Current settings

6.9 W

[V=16.04 V]

8.4 W

[V=17.67 V]

The actions performed during the shift are listed below:

13.08 UTC: ITF relocked in LN3

14.18 UTC: ITF manually unlocked to perform input beam mode matching measurement with the free swinging technique and green laser scan (performed by Suzanne, Camilla and Matthieu).

                    See detailes in 64204

15.03 UTC: ITF relocked in CARM NULL 1F

16.08 UTC: OMC scan started (performed by Romain and Andrea)

16.30 UTC: OMC scan ended 

16.52 UTC: ITF relocked in LN2

After 1.5 hr in LN2, at 18.20 UTC, Andrea will proceed with the lock acquisition.

The main ITF signals during this afternoon are shown in figure 1.

Images attached to this report
Detector Characterisation (Broadband noise)
bersanetti, tringali - 18:15 Monday 06 May 2024 (64181) Print this report
Another flyover at CEB

Today at 13:00 LT we could see an airplane flying over the main building, probably just departed from the lane nearby; one minute later it can be spotted in the CEB microphone signals, but it did not have an impact on Hrec; some 25 minutes later it probably came back along the same route, luckily causing no effect again on the sensitivity.

Images attached to this report
AdV-ISC (Sensing and control implementation)
bersanetti, ruggi - 0:44 Friday 03 May 2024 (64160) Print this report
MIR/MAR reallocation vs CARM gain, BS_TY noise injection

The activity of today was two-fold, with the focus being on understanding the relationship between the MIR/MAR reallocation issue (and the consequent 1.8 Hz oscillation) and the CARM loop gain. The underlying idea was that the CARM loop was marginal at the higher end of its phase bubble, and even the small change in gain induced by the change in the reallocation strategy between the HighPower and the LowNoise configurations could induce the crossing of CARM in the instability region.

The first test we did was in the (currently) standard configuration during science mode, with the splitting filters misbalanced towards the MIR correction:

  • 16:00:00 UTC: clean data, 240 s;
  • 16:04:30 UTC: CARM loop gain increased by 5% (16 -> 16.8), 500 s;
  • 16:14:30 UTC: CARM loop gain increased up to +7.5% (16.8 -> 17.2), 500 s;
  • 16:25:40 UTC: CARM loop gain decreased down to ~-20% (17.2 -> 13), 600 s.

The test is reported in Figure 1, where the four traces are respectively the purple, red, black and blue ones: the structures around 1.8 Hz, already present in the standard configuration, got progressively worse with the gain increased, and completely disappeared with the low gain.

We did then a test to restore the MIR/MAR reallocation filters in the low-gain condition, but this still caused the oscillation to rise and kill the lock (Figure 2).

At this point, remembering that the current CARM gain is much higher (factor ~2) than the old one, and this was mainly due to issues in the CARM loop engagement (which happens with a different filter at the end of LOCKING_CARM_NULL_1F), we wanted to test the old configuration for the lock acquisition:

  • we left the old reallocation filters we used in the past and the test in Figure 2 ;
  • we reduced the CARM gain from 16 to 9 (the one we used back in the day); in order to avoid getting back the engagement issues, we added the CARM gain reduction at the beginning of ACQUIRE_LOW_NOISE_1.

Indeed the test was successful, and we left this configuration.

Then we did some noise injections on CARM, to understand better the limits with respect to B1 saturations; we used the standars LSC_noise_MICHband filter, with different amplitudes (Figure 3):

  • 18:37:30 UTC: amplitude 5e-5, 120 s;
  • 18:40:30 UTC: amplitude 8e-5, 200 s; here we observed 1 glitch in DARM (following a 'canonical' 25min glitch);
  • 18:45:25 UTC: amplitude 1e-4, 180 s; several glitches were observed;
  • 18:48:30 UTC: amplitude 2e-4; glitches were now appearing consistently, also impacting SR alignment; the injection was quickly stopped.

We need to understand how to reduce such glitchyness without losing effectiveness in the noise injection, which is not that great to begin with; the shape of the filter is already at high frequency, relatively speaking, and moving it towards lower frequencies is tricky; also, much of the B1_DC r.m.s. is gained at 5.2 Hz (DIFFp_TY line) and at low frequency in general. Given the saturation level being around +-0.06, we are never away more than a factor of 2-3.


The other topic of today was confined in the very last part of the shift, given the importance of the first one; we just made manually a noise injection on BS_TY OpLev in order to verify the shape of the filter and the overall noise: the shape looks fine, and a noise injection of 10x the sensing noise level had no visible effect (18:55:30 UTC, 300 s, Figure4, in purple noise is generated but not injected).

More analysis on both topics may follow.

Images attached to this report
AdV-SBE (Minitowers)
bulten, was, bertolini, bersanetti, gouaty, arnaud - 10:47 Tuesday 30 April 2024 (64138) Print this report
DMS flags added to horizontal positions SBE benches
When the horizontal microsprings are adjusted, or maybe when other horizontal actions on the minitower benches are performed, the DMS system does not give a warning if the position is still far off the setpoint. This happened April 16, see logbook entry 64002 from Nicolas Arnaud. After discussions, we decided to add flags to the monitoring system; we had flags for the vertical position (-30that for the relative speeds for SNEB and SWEB with respect to the superattenuators, but this requires further study to see if there are cases that the relative speed between benches is high, but none of the flags (RMS actuator voltage, bench error signal) is already triggering.
AdV-COM (AdV commissioning (1st part) )
casanueva, derossi, boldrini, bersanetti - 23:10 Monday 22 April 2024 (64065) Print this report
ALS noise

Today the lock acquisition was very troublesome due an excess of noise on the West Green beam. We tried to check the coupling of the fibers on the DAQ room, but it didn't solve the problem. Then we went to the end building and tried to improve the fiber coupling by moving the fibers in the rack. We found a position where the noise was reduced. Still there is some green power missing, so tomorrow some more systematic alignment work will be done, in order to better align the green in the SHG box. After this action the lock acquisition worked properly.

AdV-ISC (Commissioning up to first full interferometer lock)
boldrini, bersanetti - 17:28 Monday 22 April 2024 (64060) Print this report
PR_TX gain adjustmen

A few of today's unlocks, after the wind settled down, have been caused by low gain oscillation for PR_TX (Fig.1).

Increasing the gain in CARM_NULL_1F caused an unlock soon after the transition, so we introduced a gain change in ACQUIRE_LOW_NOISE_1 (line 5232 and 5275 in ITF_LOCK.py).

The modifications can easily be reverted or made transparent (by simply setting this gain to the same value in CARM_NULL_1F and LOW_NOISE_1) if need be.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
boldrini - 21:31 Monday 22 April 2024 (64064) Print this report

Yesterday's situation has been restored: PR_TX is reset to 2.2 in CARM_NULL_1F and is set to 2.2 as well in LOW_NOISE_1.

The gain change in LOW_NOISE_1 is kept in Metatron's code, but is currently doing nothing.

Detector Characterisation (Broadband noise)
fiori, bersanetti, arnaud - 9:29 Friday 19 April 2024 (64027) Print this report
yesterday fly-over

Yesterday an helicopter was seen flying close to the Virgo buildings. This was in the late morning but the ITF was not locked. And again in the afternoo (14:30 to 15:30) when the ITF was locked.

Some indication of the passages are in the first plot, showing the RMS of some microphones in the band around 50Hz.

Helicopther noise is seen also at NEB and WEB. The sound signal is visible the band up to 200Hz, louder around 30 Hz (this can bee seen in Figure 2).

To a first look no evident glitch is seen in Hrec.

Yet, the unlock (around 15:20) is associated to scattered light arches in hrec and in B8 photodiode. At that time, judgeing from the sound level in microphones, the helicopter was close to WEB.

A correlation of the two events is possible (Figure 3).

But I would advise a better look with more accurate tools.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
fiori - 15:18 Friday 19 April 2024 (64029) Print this report

Indeed around the time of the unlock (yesterday 15:22 UTC) there has been also an earthquake (M 5.6 - 9 km W of Sulusaray, Turkey, 15:11 UTC)

The unlock was likely due to it, as reported by A.Magazzu in https://logbook.virgo-gw.eu/virgo/?r=64020.

This makes difficult to disentangle if there has been aslo an impact from the helicopter.

Images attached to this comment
direnzo - 18:13 Friday 19 April 2024 (64033) Print this report

I've checked with some Q-scans if the transit of the helicopter caused glitches in Hrec.

Figure 1: During the first transit at 14:46 UTC no excess noise was visible in Hrec, while in the CEB microphone is clearly visible the sweep caused by the helicopter.

Figure 2: during the transit at 14:59 UTC some barely coincident noise is visible in Hrec and the CEB microphone. The frequency is not exactly the same, so this may have just happened by chance.

Figure 3: some excess noise but no evident correlation at the time of the transit at 15:11 UTC. Nothing evident during all the other passages of the helicopter.

Images attached to this comment
fiori, kraja - 19:13 Saturday 20 April 2024 (64044) Print this report

This site Elian suggested: https://www.flightradar24.com/ keeps records of aircrafts tracks.  Specifically, this is the helicopter that was flying near us on April 18 and 19: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/mm82053.  Position and time are provided,  so is possible to locate its position at a particular time. Data are kept for 7 days. In particular its track of April 18 afternoon (attached shapshots) maybe passed a bit closer than 2000ft from CEB and NEB.

 

Images attached to this comment
Boschi - 19:22 Sunday 21 April 2024 (64046) Print this report

Nice idea. However the original restrictions - still enforced, as reported in the attached text of the forbidden areas of the latest release of the AIP publication (https://www.enav.it/servizi-online) - are cylinders of 2000 ft = 610 m of height but radius of 0.3 nautical miles = 1823 ft = 556 m. So probably the helicopter respected the NOTAM. 

Images attached to this comment
Paoletti - 22:22 Sunday 21 April 2024 (64052) Print this report

" So probably the helicopter respected the NOTAM. "

I guess not

Images attached to this comment
Paoletti, Boschi - 13:52 Monday 22 April 2024 (64058) Print this report
Images attached to this comment
AdV-DET (Commissioning)
bersanetti - 18:52 Wednesday 17 April 2024 (64005) Print this report
Comment to An excess noise on B1_PD3 that strangely disappeared (63991)

Today we had another event of the noise suddenly disappearing, and this happened before the lock of the OMC, at 16:02:59 UTC (Figure 1); the lock of OMC and DC Readout went through fine (Figure 2).

The error signal SDB1_LC_TY_err also shows a similar behaviour to B1_PD3 regarding the 1722 Hz line, but a much more broadband effect as well (Figure 1 and spectra in Figures 3 and 4).

Images attached to this comment
AdV-DET (Commissioning)
bersanetti - 2:57 Wednesday 17 April 2024 (63992) Print this report
Comment to An excess noise on B1_PD3 that strangely disappeared (63991)

Unfortunately the excess noise came back already at the following lock acquisition, with the same features (Fig. 1, purple, red and blue are noise, no noise, and noise again respectively).

Looking at the B1_PD3_DC spectrum we can see many big lines (and sidebands) (Fig. 2); the most offending in terms of SNR is the one at ~6885 Hz (Fig. 3), but what is striking at a first glance is that all of them are separated by ~1722 Hz, although the lowest one is not the strongest one, so maybe also some aliasing is involved.

Images attached to this comment
AdV-COM (automation)
bersanetti, pinto, ruggi - 1:59 Wednesday 17 April 2024 (63988) Print this report
Change of logic for the LOW_NOISE_1 and LOW_NOISE_2 states to bypass LowNoise1 actuation stage

As part of the today's commissioning work on the MIR/MAR reallocation between IMs and EMs, the logic of the two LowNoise configurations has been changed: a new parameter, bypass_ln1, is defined as boolean in the [ITF_LOCK] section of the ITF_LOCK.ini file.

When this parameter is set to True, during the LOW_NOISE_1 transition we will keep using the Input Mirrors to actuate. And obviously nothing will be done on the relays. Also, we will prepare the End Mirrors to use directly their LowNoise configuration, i.e. LowNoise2.

During the LOW_NOISE_2 transition, we will jump directly from HighPower to LowNoise2. The only caveat here is whether we can survive acting on the IM relays when already in LOW_NOISE_2 (we usually do that in LOW_NOISE_1). The other caveat is that with the very high useism we have now, the standard lock acquisition would probably not work anyway given our current problems.

More information on the changes at the level of the actuators are reported in the aforementioned entry.

After the (unfortunately temporary) fix of DC Readout we managed to test the new logic described here; unfortunately, as feared, acting on the IM relays while already in LowNoise2 made the ITF to unlock, at least in the single test that we could make (unlock at 23:19:51 UTC); this is apparently strange, as this kind of action was done in the past for the charge measurements, but it could be that the full switch on both IMs at the same time is too much. We could think of acting on them in series on one IM at a time, to be studied.

After this test, and seeing that the useism is going down (still far from being low, though), we reverted to the standard strategy, which needs a check anyway since it is embedded in the same new logic. Unfortunately we started to have issues again in the OMC/DC Readout phase, so this is still ongoing at the time of writing.

AdV-DET (Commissioning)
gouaty, bersanetti, hui, pinto - 1:36 Wednesday 17 April 2024 (63991) Print this report
An excess noise on B1_PD3 that strangely disappeared

While investigating the problem with the lock in DC readout, we noticed that the B1_PD3 audio channel was much noisier than usual for all frequencies above 100 Hz, and also the OMC PZT correction spectrum was much noisier. We also noticed that the power on the carrier TEM00 was lower than expected for a DARM offset of -0.20.

Then, without doing anything, we observed a sudden transient at 21h40 utc that made this excess noise disappear and the B1_PD3_DC power getting back to normal.

The attached figures are comparing the B1_PD3 and OMC corrections spectrum with the excess noise (in purple) and the situation right after the noise disappeared (blue).

It was then possible to relock in DC readout while keeping the same parameters as usual for the transition to DC readout.

This strange excess noise will be further investigated tomorrow.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
bersanetti - 2:57 Wednesday 17 April 2024 (63992) Print this report

Unfortunately the excess noise came back already at the following lock acquisition, with the same features (Fig. 1, purple, red and blue are noise, no noise, and noise again respectively).

Looking at the B1_PD3_DC spectrum we can see many big lines (and sidebands) (Fig. 2); the most offending in terms of SNR is the one at ~6885 Hz (Fig. 3), but what is striking at a first glance is that all of them are separated by ~1722 Hz, although the lowest one is not the strongest one, so maybe also some aliasing is involved.

Images attached to this comment
gouaty, masserot, was - 17:38 Wednesday 17 April 2024 (64004) Print this report

For debugging purposes, the channels Audio and DC related to the B1_PD3 and B1s_PD1 photodiodes acquired at 100KHz are now stored with the "_FS" suffix and available in the RAW_FULL stream .

  • operations complete at 2024-04-17-15h25m26-UTC

Below the list of the channels, acquired by the SDB2_DBOX_RightDown - SDB2_MezzPD2  mezzanines at 100KHz and stored with the  "_FS" suffix:

 V1:SDB2_B1_PD3_Audio_raw_FS              nData= 100000 min= -6.11e+03  mean=-4.89e+03  max=-3.56e+03 rate= 100000Hz
 V1:SDB2_B1_PD3_DC_raw_FS                 nData= 100000 min= -3.55e+03  mean=-3.31e+03  max=-3.07e+03 rate= 100000Hz
 V1:SDB2_B1sP_PD1_Audio_raw_FS            nData= 100000 min= -2.69e+05  mean=-2.67e+05  max=-2.65e+05 rate= 100000Hz
 V1:SDB2_B1sP_PD1_DC_raw_FS               nData= 100000 min= -3.62e+03  mean=-3.38e+03  max=-3.14e+03 rate= 100000Hz
 V1:SDB2_B1s_PD1_Audio_raw_FS             nData= 100000 min=  6.12e+04  mean=  6.2e+04  max= 6.28e+04 rate= 100000Hz
 V1:SDB2_B1s_PD1_DC_raw_FS                nData= 100000 min=  1.54e+04  mean= 1.57e+04  max=  1.6e+04 rate= 100000Hz

 

 

bersanetti - 18:52 Wednesday 17 April 2024 (64005) Print this report

Today we had another event of the noise suddenly disappearing, and this happened before the lock of the OMC, at 16:02:59 UTC (Figure 1); the lock of OMC and DC Readout went through fine (Figure 2).

The error signal SDB1_LC_TY_err also shows a similar behaviour to B1_PD3 regarding the 1722 Hz line, but a much more broadband effect as well (Figure 1 and spectra in Figures 3 and 4).

Images attached to this comment
gouaty, masserot - 0:18 Thursday 18 April 2024 (64008) Print this report

The following plots shows a 300s FFTTime of the SDB2_B1p_PD1_Audio, SDB2_B1_PD3_Audio and the  SDB2_B1s_PD1_Audio channels during the OMC lock acquisition where the purple rectangle highlights  the periods with the presence of unexpected lines

  • successfull OMC lock
    • 2024-04-01-00h45m00-UTC : FFTTime plot
    • 2024-04-04-13h34m00-UTC:  FFTTime plot,
      • this FFT plot compare the ASD  of the related channels (Audio and sample) for 2 periods: when some lines are present(purple)  and a quiet period(blue}
    • 2024-04-07-19h41m00-UTC:  FFTTime plot
    • 2024-04-09-20h43m00-UTC:  FFTTime plot
      • this FFT plot compare the ASD  of the related channels (Audio and sample) for 2 periods: when some lines are present(purple)  and a quiet period(blue}
    • 2024-04-14-10h52m00-UTC:  FFTTime plot :
      • During the OMC temperature scan, there is a period (blue rectangle) where the lines amplitude increases in the SDB2_B1s_PD1_Audio channels and appears in the  SDB2_B1_PD3_Audio channel
      • this FFT plot compare the ASD  of the related channels (Audio and sample) for 2 periods: when some lines are present(purple) and a quiet period(blue}
    • 2024-04-16-00h09m00-UTC: FFTTime plot
      • same statement for the blue rectangle as the previous event
    • 2024-04-17-03h40m40-UTC: FFTTime  plot
      • same statement for the blue rectangle as the previous event
    • From all these plots it seems that
      • there is a noisy time period (purple rectangle) when the OMC shutter is opened . This time period has increased with the time  and seems to start to reduce (see last event)
      • when the noisy time period is long, during the OMC temperature scan  a more noisy period occurs (blue rectangle

 

  • unsuccessfull OMC lock
    • 2024-04-16-21h24m20-UTC: FFTTime plot
      • the noise does not disappear but seems to increase according to the OMC temperature analysis (blue rectangle) to remain when the OMC is locked
      • this FFT plot and its zoom compare the ASD  of the related channels (Audio and sample) for 2 periods: at the beginning when the OMC shutter is opened (purple) and when the OMC is locked with B1_PD3 (blue) : the noise has increased when the OMC is locked with B1_PD3
    • 2024-04-17-00h14m00-UTC: FFTTime plot
    • For reasons unknown today, the noise present when opening the OMC shutter does not disappear and moreover increases triggering the unlocking of the OMC
Images attached to this comment
gouaty, masserot - 0:29 Thursday 18 April 2024 (64009) Print this report

Here we report a few more observations concerning the excess noise causing problems to reach DC readout.

The excess noise is visible on the audio channels of several photodiodes (Fig.1 and Fig.2): B1s, B1sP and B1_PD3 (which are on the same service mezzanine) as well as on the B1p_PD1 audio channel (however in this later case, only lines are present, while for B1s and B1_PD3 there is a clear impact on the noise floor).

As reported already by Diego, an extra noise is also present on the SDB1_LC_TX_err and SDB1_LC_TY_err signals at the same time as the noise is present on the photodiodes. This SDB1_LC_TX/TY_err signals are constructed from the SDB1 B5 QD2 H and V signals, which also see the extra noise. This observation concerning the SDB1 local control was already true yesterday (Fig.3)

Both the spectrum of the B1_PD1 audio channel, and those of SDB1_B5_QD2_H/V signals are clean when we are in CARM_NULL_1F (Fig.4).

The extra lines on B1p_PD1 and the extra noise on the B5 QD2 signals show up as soon as the OMC shutter is open (Fig.5). The lines showing up on B1_PD1 are at the same frequency as the lines seen on B1s (Fig.6), although the B1s noise floor changes when the lock of the OMC is acquired.

Images attached to this comment
gouaty, masserot - 0:46 Thursday 18 April 2024 (64010) Print this report

The first lock at 16h00-UTC was luky as  the OMC lock noise disappeared just after the OMC lock with B1_PD3_Audio (plot) but not the others ones  (ie 21h50m-UTC one)

Images attached to this comment
mwas - 8:31 Thursday 18 April 2024 (64012) Print this report

Figure 1. Another channel that sees the noise is SDB1_B5_QD1_H (and all the other channels of the quadrants on SDB1). It sees the noise start when the slow shutter on SDB1 starts opening 15:59:16, then the noise level is constant, and the it stops. On B1 PD3 the noise level stops when it stops on B5 QD1, and it is present only when there is light on B1 PD3, so that is the reason why the level of noise on B1 PD3 varies in time during these 5 minutes.

This is most likely due to the slow shutter of the OMC which is mounted on an Agilis translation stage with electronic end of range stops. The stops are failing and the piezo-motor of the shutter keeps trying to push it further even though the translation stage arrived at the end of its range.

Figure 2. Shows that the OMC thermistor sees a line at ~1721 Hz when the slow shutter is in motion. This is likely the electrical cross-coupling of the voltage sent to the slow shutter showing up on the voltage readout used for the temperature measurement.  In blue is when the shutter moves and in purple when the shutter doesn't move. Unfortunately dataDisplay can't seem to handle the dynamic, and making an FFTtime plot of this channel doesn't seem to work.

FIgure 3. When the shutter is closing after an unlock there is also a 1721Hz line preens in OMC1 T1, but it is 10 times smaller.

Figure 4. OMC T1 also sees the 1721Hz when opening the OMC shutter in single bounce. The line stays on for about 30 minutes, before stopping by itself. The shutter is closed 20 minutes after the line stops by itself according to the shutter log file.

Action items to debug this further and mitigate it:

  • To open the OMC slow shutter use a given number of step instead of moving the shutter to the limit. The needed number of steps to open the shutter need to be tested, for example in single bounce after the next unlock.
  • Keep using the move to limit command for closing the shutter, so the shutter always goes back to the same position after a round trip.
  • Test the operation of the OMC slow shutter in single bounce. The problem can be seen on OMC1 T1 when opening the shuter. Turn on/off the driver of the slow shutter and see if that restores the functioning of the translation stage stops.
  • Investigate in past data if the shutter has started to slow down, if it takes more seconds between when the shutter command is sent and when the light appears on B1s.
  • Check if the height of 1721Hz line is constant on OMC1 T1 when the shutter is opened, or if it changes in height after a fews tens of seconds when the translation stage arrives at the stop.
  • Investigate in past data if the height of the 1721Hz line when the shutter is being opened has increased over the past months.
Images attached to this comment
AdV-COM (AdV commissioning (1st part) )
ruggi, pinto, bersanetti - 21:22 Tuesday 16 April 2024 (63990) Print this report
New filters for arm marionette reallocation

Last night a big worsening of the weather condition  arrived (fig 1) and produced the feared increase of correction on NE / WE mirrors, touching some time 10 V (fig 2). There was no need to wait for the strong wind of today, because the microseismic region, between 0.5 and 1 Hz, was enough to create problems (fig. 3).

Today we had in mind to test a filter for the windy condition, so we proceeded like that. In fig 4 we see that a result was achieved for the low frequency (200 mHz and < 100 mHz): a worsening of the sismic signal (first plot) did not produce an equivalent worsening of the correction. Unfortunately, we were again close to the instability at 1.8 Hz.

The next planned test was to move the marionette correction from ITMs to ETMs and see the effect on the 1,8 Hz instability. We started moving the north arm and the 1.8 Hz became quickly unstable, unlocking the ITF (fig 5, fig 6). Probably the right way to do the test would have been to move both the arms at the same time, but we had no opportunity to try.

We developed a new filter, which is supposed to gain less at low frequency, improve a bit between 0.5 and 1 Hz, and behave at 1.8 Hz about like the one which worked well the past days. We are waiting for a successful lock to know if it works.

In order to achieve LN2 in the current weather condition, a change of transition strategy was required, because normally we need to pass through a locking done by only a pair of mirror coils instead of all the four. If the mirror correction often exceeds 5 V like now, very likely it will saturate when 2 coils are used with the double gain. It happened like that the time we tried the normal transition. The new strategy consists in skipping the transition to LN1: setting directly the LN2 state for ETMs actuation and moving form ITMs to ETMs in this condition, we can continue using the four coils. The strategy worked, but it was not totally tested: the final step of disabling the ITMs high power state through the relays was not tested yet. The usual glitch caused by this action could be too large for LN2. The glitch could be eventually reduced because it is due to a DC value present on the high power actuation, which can be better subtracted digitally.

Images attached to this report
AdV-COM (automation)
bersanetti, carbognani - 19:59 Wednesday 10 April 2024 (63926) Print this report
O4b tag for automation code
AdV-COM (AdV commissioning (1st part) )
casanueva, bersanetti, boldrini, ruggi, spinicelli - 23:32 Saturday 06 April 2024 (63870) Print this report
Turn on DIFFp UGF servos in LN3

After solving the issue of the marionetta of the NI, the ITF started unlocking at acquire LN3. We noticed very fast unlocks, due to the fast shutter closing very soon. No clear loop seemed guilty, but we noticed that the DIFFp TX UGF servo was not working because its line didn't have coherence. However the DIFFp TY gain was increasing quite strongly during the transition. So we increased the gain of the loop to keep the UGF stable, and it seemed to work. We also noticed that the UGF servos were off once in science, even if the lines were ON, so we commented the commands that turn them off.

We left the ITFlocked  in LN3.

AdV-COM (AdV commissioning (1st part) )
ruggi, casanueva, bersanetti, boldrini, spinicelli - 17:36 Saturday 06 April 2024 (63869) Print this report
1.8 Hz oscillation due to NI marionette reallocation

The locking troubles were due to an instability at 1.8 Hz of NI marionette reallocation. The problem appears when the correction on the mirror is moved from NI to NE, and at the same time the splitting filters with higher crossover are engaged. Such a problem has never been observed before, but in principle an instability in that region cannot be excluded. There are resonances of the two suspensions which can have slightly different frequency and can create unstable crossing points. Why this problem should appear now, after years of correct work, I don't know. Some measurement is required in order to see if the problem can be explained by a loop model, and a more robust strategy can be found. For the moment, the gain on the filter on MA branch has been changed from the nominal one (0.416) to 0.38. The instability is no more there, but clearly is not very far. Changing more the gain could create different problems, so let's leave the things like that untill a good model will be available.

AdV-COM (automation)
bersanetti, carbognani, masserot, mours - 22:37 Friday 05 April 2024 (63860) Print this report
Comment to Introduction of the ITF_CONDITIONS node and update of the ITF_STATUS node (63828)
This afternoon we actually put in operation this update.
The problem we were facing with the introduction of the new ITF_CONDITIONS node was that we had 2 nodes using the DQ_META SER prefix and this was creating conflicts leading to the unavailability of some channels including META_ITF_LOCK..index.
The solution proposed by Benoit was to replace the line:
FDOUT_CM FbmAlp "#SER V1:META_* V1:DQ_*" 0 -1

in the automation node config by
FDOUT_SELECT_CHANNELS "V1:META_* V1:DQ_*"
FDOUT_CONVERT_SERDATA
FDOUT_CM FbmAlp "*" 0 -1

so to convert the SerData to AdcData at the output of the Metatron node and avoid the conflict.
We tried the suggested conversion to AdcData but it was not working initially. Benoit diagnosed that the issue may have been associated to the version of Fd being used by metatron.
Indeed by creating a dev version of metatron (/virgoDev/metatron/v0r3p1) running into a conda env updated to Fd 8.61.1 (/virgoDev/mamba/env/automation) and by just applying the conversion to AdcData for the ITF_CONDITIONS node things were then working fine.

So the channels now created by ITF_LOCK (in particular META_ITF_LOCK..index) and ITF_STATUS are as before (SerData) and only DQ_META_AUTORELOCK_*, DQ_META_ITF_LOCKED, DQ_META_NOMINAL_LOCK, and DQ_META_ITF_LOCK_REQUEST are now AdcData.

We keep things running in the current configuration further checking for any other unintended side effects. Plotting of the most relevant channels looks ok (Fig. 1) and the ITF Mode could be driven from the updated ITF_STATUS node without problem.



Images attached to this comment
AdV-ISC (LSC Noise Budget)
boldrini, casanueva, bersanetti, pinto - 21:00 Friday 05 April 2024 (63858) Print this report
SSFS noise injection script

We prepared and tested the SSFS noise injections:

  • 700 Hz - 1000 Hz (ampl: 40)
  • 400 Hz - 700 Hz (ampl: 4.8)
  • 200 Hz - 400 Hz (ampl: 2.56e-2)
  • 100 Hz - 200 Hz (ampl: 1.28e-4)
  • 1 kHz - 10 kHz (ampl:10)

The corresponding butterworth flters have been saved in CAL_noise and the process has been restarted. After re-locking the ITF, we tested the inject_SSFS.py script in virgoDev/Automation/scripts/LSC. The test was successful up to SSFS_2, during this injection the ITF unlocked. SSFS_2 and SSFS_3 still need to be tested successfully, the noise injection amplitude is probably too large.

We tested a noise injection on SRCL using the 'SRCL_noise_butter' filter. The filter was not present in ACL_noise filter bank, we introduced it before restarting the process for SSFS. We tested the noise injection with amplitude 6.4e-3 and found good coherence. We saved these parameters in the inject_lsc.py script.

On-call intervention (General)
bersanetti - 1:04 Friday 05 April 2024 (63850) Print this report
Interferometer stuck in DOWN

After the unlock at 21:36:06 UTC I was called because the interferometer was stuck in DOWN, with the SQZ PLLs apparently not locking.

In reality the issue was caused by DET_MAIN stuck in SHUTTER_CHECK_CLOSED, possibly because of some PD not engaged during the check. A manual cycle through INIT solved the issue and the slow shutter could be closed.

When in DOWN, ITF_LOCK asks SQZ_MAIN to go to DOWN, where the PLLs are/can stay unlocked; only after every node is back to idle, just before resuming the lock acquisition, ITF_LOCK asks SQZ_MAIN to lock the PLLs. In any case, SQZ_MAIN is managed in a looser way with respect to the other nodes and it is not blocking for the lock acquisition until the very last stages, when we want the SQZ to actually be ready for injection.

AdV-COM (automation)
bersanetti, carbognani - 20:06 Wednesday 03 April 2024 (63828) Print this report
Introduction of the ITF_CONDITIONS node and update of the ITF_STATUS node

Today we put in operation a new node, ITF_CONDITIONS, and we updated the already existing ITF_STATUS one. The underlying process is described in gitlab issue #19, and the main goal is to decouple what we call ITF Modes (Commissioning, Calibration, Maintenance, etc.) to ITF Conditions (Not Locked, Locking, Locked) as conditions are something the machine is doing whatever it is we want to do with it. The Conditions are:

ITF Condition META_ITF_CONDITIONS_index
Not Locked 10
Locking 20
Llocked 30

Conditions are automatically generated by the ITF_CONDITIONS node, which only has a few states selectable; the main is DOWN, which is basically the default state, then the node will transition automatically to the three main conditions, dependently of the status of the interferometer itself, by tracking the index of the main ITF_LOCK node. The only other functionality ITF_CONDITIONS has is the Autorelock Failsafe one, which has been migrated from ITF_STATUS. This is working exactly as before, by selecting the state of the same name. The STOP state will exit from this.

Being stripped of such functionality and old unnecessary O3 code, now ITF_STATUS only deals with the modes, that have to be set manually by people, and which describe what the machine is targeted to do (or what is preventing the same thing); the modes are changed with respect to the past, and we have a few additions; each corresponds to a given node state as usual. The complete list is in the following table, and the number represents the value of the DQ_META_ITF_Mode channel (the new modes are listed in bold):

ITF Mode DQ_META_ITF_Mode value
Science 1
Adjusting -1
Commissioning -3
Maintenance -4
Calibration -5
Injection -6
PrepareScience -7
Earthquake -8
BadWeather -9
Upgrading -11
Troubleshooting -12
Dqstudies -13

About the new modes: Earthquake and BadWeather are to be set when the machine is in some kind of trouble in locking, because we have the effects of one of the two, the second one (BadWeather) referring mostly to high wind and/or high microseismic activity.

PrepareScience is the default mode when none of the others is actually happening: this means thatif  we are locking only to reach the nominal state and then take data, this is the mode. As usual, the transition to Science can be done from any state, and the node itself will take care of checking whether this is legit or not, based on the ITF_LOCK index as usual; the transition will be not even started in the case, avoiding going in and out even for a second. If for any reason we exit from Science (unlock, transition between LOW_NOISE_3 to LOW_NOISE_3_SQZ, etc), the node will automatically fall to PREPARE_SCIENCE, losing memory of the previous state, which we think is the right thing to do. After that, the mode will stay PREPARE_SCIENCE waiting for a manual operation.

To recap: Modes and Conditions are decoupled, independent information. The information Not Locked, Locking and Locked now are the (only) Conditions, and whatever was looking at them based on the DQ_META_ITF_Mode value should move to check the ITF_CONDITIONS_index instead.

The Modes are instead almost identical to the previous behaviour, and we just have three new modes.

The node graphs of the two nodes are attached.


EDIT: we temporarily reverted to the old ways, as there is some unforeseen and currently unexplained bug impacting the production of h(t), which should only look at META_ITF_LOCK_index, which wasn't affected by the aforementioned changes.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments to this report:
bersanetti, carbognani, masserot, mours - 22:37 Friday 05 April 2024 (63860) Print this report
This afternoon we actually put in operation this update.
The problem we were facing with the introduction of the new ITF_CONDITIONS node was that we had 2 nodes using the DQ_META SER prefix and this was creating conflicts leading to the unavailability of some channels including META_ITF_LOCK..index.
The solution proposed by Benoit was to replace the line:
FDOUT_CM FbmAlp "#SER V1:META_* V1:DQ_*" 0 -1

in the automation node config by
FDOUT_SELECT_CHANNELS "V1:META_* V1:DQ_*"
FDOUT_CONVERT_SERDATA
FDOUT_CM FbmAlp "*" 0 -1

so to convert the SerData to AdcData at the output of the Metatron node and avoid the conflict.
We tried the suggested conversion to AdcData but it was not working initially. Benoit diagnosed that the issue may have been associated to the version of Fd being used by metatron.
Indeed by creating a dev version of metatron (/virgoDev/metatron/v0r3p1) running into a conda env updated to Fd 8.61.1 (/virgoDev/mamba/env/automation) and by just applying the conversion to AdcData for the ITF_CONDITIONS node things were then working fine.

So the channels now created by ITF_LOCK (in particular META_ITF_LOCK..index) and ITF_STATUS are as before (SerData) and only DQ_META_AUTORELOCK_*, DQ_META_ITF_LOCKED, DQ_META_NOMINAL_LOCK, and DQ_META_ITF_LOCK_REQUEST are now AdcData.

We keep things running in the current configuration further checking for any other unintended side effects. Plotting of the most relevant channels looks ok (Fig. 1) and the ITF Mode could be driven from the updated ITF_STATUS node without problem.



Images attached to this comment
carbognani - 17:12 Tuesday 09 April 2024 (63906) Print this report

As one outcome of the dedicated discussions, the DQ_META_ITF_Mode coding has been updated so that indices of modes which do not exist anymore are not reused, this lead to:

  • Science = ["Science", 1]
  • Adjusting = ["Adjusting", -1]
  • Commissioning = ["Commissioning", -3]
  • Maintenance = ["Maintenance", -4]
  • Calibration = ["Calibration", -5]
  • Injection = ["Injection", -6]
  • Upgrading = ["Upgrading", -11]
  • Troubleshooting = ["Troubleshooting", -12]
  • Dqstudies = ["Dqstudies", -13]
  • PrepareScience = ["Prepare_Science", -14]
  • Earthquake = ["Earthquake", -15]
  • BadWeather = ["Bad_Weather", -16]


Every application looking at DQ_META_ITF_Mode should check and eventually adapt to the new coding.

AdV-ISC (Commissioning up to first full interferometer lock)
casanueva, boldrini, bersanetti, spinicelli, masserot - 18:08 Tuesday 02 April 2024 (63817) Print this report
Evening unlocks

After the maintenance, we have had mainly two types of unlocks: some at CARM_MC_IR, which we didn't pay much attention since the seismic and wind activity are high. However, every time that we rach CARM NULL 1f we would unlock. We could see many "oscillations" on all the longitudinal loops, the PR angular loops and then saturation of B2 photodiode.

It took some time to understand the reason for these unlocks, but since they were all of them at the same moment Diego remembered that it was the moment when we enagge the CARM slow loop. Indeed it looked like it was oscillating at veyr low frequency, so we increased its gain and it worked (1/1 times, we need to see if this works in the long time). Figure 1 shows the clearest example.

WHile debugging I profited to tune the demodulation phase of MICH and SRCL on DRMI 3F, which was off by 0.2 only, then I checked it at STEP 3, and CARM NULL 3f and it looked well tuned. I also fine tuned the DARM phase in STEP3, which ws off by 0.3.

This doesn't explain the unlocks of yesteday on STEP 2 and STEP 3. We keep on investigating.

Images attached to this report
AdV-COM (automation)
bersanetti - 19:01 Friday 29 March 2024 (63791) Print this report
Comment to Automation cleanup (63768)

The cleanup has been completed for ITF_LOCK, and also the following nodes have been checked but basically they needed no big cleanup: NARM_LOCK, WARM_LOCK, SUS, TCS_MAIN.

A full lock acquisition has been tested already to verify that no mistakes have been done in ITF_LOCK.

AdV-ISC (Commissioning up to first full interferometer lock)
mantovani, bersanetti - 17:06 Friday 29 March 2024 (63790) Print this report
SR ty line on @ LN3

We have re-enabled in the automation the SR ty line with the usual amplitude 1.8 at LN3

Search Help
×

Warning

×