Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
AdV-TCS (Point Absorbers Mitigation)
berni, nardecchia, spinicelli, was - 22:55 Tuesday 30 September 2025 (67832) Print this report
IPATSiA measurements on the WE in LN2

Today, we continued the activity that started in 67723.

This time, the CO₂ PA was shined on the WE to perform the vertical scan in LN2 (and not in LN3 with the SR partially aligned).

  • 10:41 UTC – Switched on the chiller at 19°C and the CO₂ laser.

  • 14:00 UTC – ITF manually unlocked from LN3 (after putting commissioning). Shortly after, an earthquake prevented the relock for some time.

  • 17:21 UTC – Relocked in LN2.

Position 2 (as in Figure 1, same as entry [67723]):

  • 17:44:40 UTC – Flip mirror opened.

  • 18:23:00 UTC – Flip mirror closed.

Position 1 (as in Figure 2, same as entry [67723]):

  • 18:37 UTC – Changed PA position onto the test mass.

  • 18:39:51 UTC – Flip mirror opened.

  • 19:15:01 UTC – Flip mirror closed.

  • At 19,21 UTC, we put the ITF in LN3.

  • At 19.43 UTC: we start to shine the CO2 PA in LN3 (in Position 1)

  • At 20.06 UTC we closed the flip mirror and switched off the CO2 laser.
    When we operated in LN3, we experienced some instability in the CO₂ power due to temperature variations. A tuning of the chiller setpoint would have been required,
    but there was no time to perform it. As a result, during the shining period we did not have a constant CO₂ PA power.

The behaviour of the CO₂ laser during the shift is shown in Figure 3 and the main ITF signals are shown in Figure 4. 

Concerning the LN2 measurements:

  • In Position 2, B7/B8 power decreased by ~3 %, optical gain decreased by ~1 %, and BNS range decreased by ~10 % w.r.t. nominal condition.

  • In Position 1, B7/B8 power decreased by ~7 %, optical gain decreased by ~3 %, and BNS range decreased by ~6 % w.r.t. nominal condition.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
mwas - 19:08 Wednesday 01 October 2025 (67839) Print this report

One concern in previous measurements was that the noise increase measured by h(t) could be due to IPATSIA beam power fluctuations.The results from yesterday exclude that possiblity for two reasons:

  • The noise level was different for different points on the mirror that were at similar distance from the middle of the mirror.
  • The noise disappears from the sensitivity with a delay of a few minutes after the IPATSiA shutter is closed

Figure 1 shows a time when the shutter was closed. The BNS range increases by 4Mpc over 3 minutes, while the power in the arms increases in less than 1 minute, and the optical gain in ~90s. Normally when we have 25 minute glitches the BNS range drops for ~90s, as the BNS range is using an average over ~90s, so the 3 minute transition cannot be just an effect of the time averaging in Hrec. The slightly slower increase in optical gain than in arm power can be cause by the averaging done in Hrec.

Images attached to this comment
ruggi - 16:25 Friday 03 October 2025 (67857) Print this report

Concerning the time scale of noise variation when IPATSIA is turned ON/OFF, I made the computation of a sort of range on time segments of 20 s. The computation is based on the inverse of Hrec normalized power spectrum, as we do for BNS range, but using the shape of the mystery noise to normalize the curve. Fig 1 shows the time evolution of that parameter during IPATSIA test. This is not really much different from the BNS range, but the sampling is a bit faster, in order to eliminate any doubt that the time scale of 200 s is really due to the noise variation and not to the computation.

Together with the range, also the power in the arms is shown. Fig 2 and fig 3 are zoom of short periods around the ON/OFF actions. I see that normally the time scale of 200 s is present also in the variation of the power. The second event is strange, because the power increases very quickly, but there is a clear overshoot followed by a small decrease with the usual time scale. I would say that a common origin of the noise and power variations cannot be excluded.

In addition, one can notice that the noise when IPATSIA is ON is higher not only in the floor, but also in several structures, normally associated to stray light in DET area (fig 4). I computed the rms of Hrec around one of those peaks (315 Hz): the same time scale is visible (fig 5).

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

Error

The present report has been modified outside this window. Please check for its integrity in the main page.

Refreshing this page will move this report into drafts.

×